18 Jul 15
1 edit
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby (Page 7)Reset for divegeester.
"Please state your belief with a reference to an authoritative source in which you place your trust. Thanks." (OP)
If not "the Word of God", which "authoritative source" would you recommend be referenced in this spirituality forum?
Originally posted by twhitehead"Continue what?" twhitehead, you're a highly intelligent person whose knowledge on various subjects is hardly ever disclosed all at one time here or in the science forum. You've also taken issue with statements within this thread regarding what I personally believe . So please continue to develop the authoritative basis and factual rationales supporting your disagreement. Thank you.
Continue what?
18 Jul 15
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyFirst, please acknowledge whether or not you have understood what I have said so far in this thread. I don't think it requires further development nor 'authoritative basis' and 'factual rationales' to support it. I have stated clearly my reasons for my objections and I have not seen anything from you that disputes what I have said.
"Continue what?" twhitehead, you're a highly intelligent person whose knowledge on various subjects is hardly ever disclosed all at one time here or in the science forum. You've also taken issue with statements within this thread regarding what I personally believe . So please continue to develop the authoritative basis and factual rationales supporting your disagreement. Thank you.
18 Jul 15
Originally posted by twhitehead"I have stated clearly my reasons for my objections and I have not seen anything from you that disputes what I have said." twhitehead, yes you have posted "objections" along with your reasons for them; however, you have not yet stated what you believe which is the only topic of this thread. Doing so will shed light on the areas of our disagreement. Please begin doing so now. Thank you.
First, please acknowledge whether or not you have understood what I have said so far in this thread. I don't think it requires further development nor 'authoritative basis' and 'factual rationales' to support it. I have stated clearly my reasons for my objections and I have not seen anything from you that disputes what I have said.
18 Jul 15
Originally posted by divegeesterAre you an agnostic theist?
Many of the Christians in this forum are intellectually dishonest. Most of the atheists are not. They remain Christians and atheists but your partisan approach to the forum precludes you from making this distinction even when it is blatant and in your face. Look at Hinds and the exchange about the 7 headed beast for example. Look at lemon limes behaviour and avoidance of topic. It's pathetic.
19 Jul 15
Originally posted by twhiteheadI'm sure I've left something out of the equations, but it seems to me that a person couldn't be a bigger douche bag than what you've consistently put forth.
First, please acknowledge whether or not you have understood what I have said so far in this thread. I don't think it requires further development nor 'authoritative basis' and 'factual rationales' to support it. I have stated clearly my reasons for my objections and I have not seen anything from you that disputes what I have said.
By all means, tell me where I missed the math.
19 Jul 15
Originally posted by FreakyKBHHis math usually includes a factor of infinite credible deniability. (icd)
I'm sure I've left something out of the equations, but it seems to me that a person couldn't be a bigger douche bag than what you've consistently put forth.
By all means, tell me where I missed the math.
But the equation falls miserably apart if he tries plugging in a factor of infinitely unbelievable incredibility. (iui) It was rookie mistake, but none of us are perfect... and some of us are less perfect than others.
19 Jul 15
Originally posted by lemon limeI don't fault the imperfections: mine are legion.
His math usually includes a factor of infinite credible deniability. (icd)
But the equation falls miserably apart if he tries plugging in a factor of infinitely unbelievable incredibility. (iui) It was rookie mistake, but none of us are perfect... and some of us are less perfect than others.
I don't doubt the honesty: reject the timing of the chorus.
- Joined
- 08 Dec 04
- Moves
- 100919
19 Jul 15
I believe God is one. I believe Jesus is his son.
I believe God is all good(light) and there is no darkness in him.
I believe Satan came to kill, steal and destroy, but Man(including many Christians) blames God.
I believe God is NOT in control of every thing that happens.
I believe the dead are dead until Christ returns to this earth.
I believe hell will be a real place where demons and people will burn up and cease to exist.
19 Jul 15
Originally posted by FreakyKBHI don't fault imperfections either, but I think it would be easier for him to solve p-vs-np than trying to explain how knowing without knowing is somehow able to trump knowing because of knowing.
I don't fault the imperfections: mine are legion.
I don't doubt the honesty: reject the timing of the chorus.
I don't doubt the honesty: reject the timing of the chorus.
If you don't mind my asking... whose honesty and which chorus?