23 Sep '19 13:26>
"Thou doth protest too much."
@fmf saidBased on your understanding of a ‘subjective opinion’ it’s impossible for it to be absolutely true, right?
The opinion that Ghost of a Duke and I share about your intermittent integrity, and my sense that you have deteriorated in this regard in the last 3 or so years, are subjective opinions.
@dj2becker saidRead the thread again. Stop trolling.
Based on your understanding of a ‘subjective opinion’ it’s impossible for it to be absolutely true, right?
@fmf saidDodge noted. And same old catch phrase. It’s getting boring.😴
Read the thread again. Stop trolling.
@dj2becker saidYou are running circles around me. It seems your religion is true after all.
Dodge noted. And same old catch phrase. It’s getting boring.😴
@fmf saidOh dear.
You are running circles around me. It seems your religion is true after all.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhat is the meaning of integrity really when explained within a context of moral relativism?
I am perpetually surprised by your lack of integrity. Even on the little things.
@dj2becker saidDo you actually think that your beliefs being in a context of your supposed and unilaterally declared "absolute truth" gives your perception of integrity more "meaning" than Ghost of a Duke's perception of integrity?
What is the meaning of integrity really when explained within a context of moral relativism?
@fmf saidLogically if you have two contradictory definitions of integrity they can’t both be right. Or do you believe they can?
Do you actually think that your beliefs being in a context of your supposed and unilaterally declared "absolute truth" gives your perception of integrity more "meaning" than Ghost of a Duke's perception of integrity?
@dj2becker saidIf you want to converse with me, you need to answer my question. If I feel I am being trolled, then I give in. Not interested. Try your thing on another poster. My question?
Logically if you have two contradictory definitions of integrity they can’t both be right. Or do you believe they can?
@dj2becker saidDo you think your riff about "contradictory definitions" gives your perception of integrity more "meaning" than Ghost of a Duke's perception of integrity?
Logically if you have two contradictory definitions of integrity they can’t both be right. Or do you believe they can?
@fmf saidSays the guy who has dodged many a question of mine.
If you want to converse with me, you need to answer my question. If I feel I am being trolled, then I give in. Not interested. Try your thing on another poster. My question?