3 edits
Originally posted by avalanchethecatoops, i forgot about how much you value being politically correct, gaydo is Glaswegian colloquialism for gayness, something which is described as gaydo has the quality of being gay! It may be applied to actions, a person or in this instance a film.
What is 'gaydo'? Are you just trying to see how near to being offensive you can get?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAh Robbie, if only you could get over this ree-dick-ulous JW thing and stop denying your obviously homosexual leanings, I think you could become a really cool guy. Maybe. Probably not though.
oops, i forgot about how much you value being politically correct, gaydo is Glaswegian colloquialism for gayness, something which is described as gaydo has the quality of being gay! It may be applied to actions, a person or in this instance a film.
1 edit
Originally posted by avalanchethecatare you saying that i have latent homosexual tendencies? plueeeze, i spend half my life day dreaming about the female torso.
Ah Robbie, if only you could get over this ree-dick-ulous JW thing and stop denying your obviously homosexual leanings, I think you could become a really cool guy. Maybe. Probably not though.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAnd the other half discussing male gay sex. Odd combination. I haven't read most of this thread, did you ever go into female gay sex at all, or is that perfectly healthy?
are you saying that i have latent homosexual tendencies? plueeeze, i spend half my life day dreaming about the female torso.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt's a well-known fact that the most vociferous anti-gay campaigners invariably turn out to be closet-cases. Often they're not even aware of it until suddenly - BAM - craving for... well... family site 'n all that...
are you saying that i have latent homosexual tendencies? plueeeze, i spend half my life day dreaming about the female torso.
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThank you for your reply. It is not entirely satisfying to my American temperament but I think I understand your reticence. I hope you can appreciate that there are people who, if in agreement with your condemnation of these practices, will want to implement their condemnation via government. I hope you can see situations when you need to make it clear that you are not arguing for or against laws allowing the use of violence against, or forcible imprisonment or institutionalization of, consenting adults who engage in these practices you find objectionable.
yes you are correct, but one gets caught up in the melee, i humble myself and bow low towards the earth, here was your question,
What do you want people to do on the basis of the beliefs you want them to accept?
Interesting in itself, because it it highlights he difference between religion and philosophy, the latter merely being content to lo ...[text shortened]... hin the framework of the forum, or more importantly, within the psyche of those who frequent it.
Also to your statement "In this matter i always insist that legislation is a matter for the government and that as long as it does not infringe upon the exercise of the faculty of conscience and Biblical principles, i am happy."
In the US the government may not, in its laws and other activities, favor the principles of one religion over the principles of other religions.
Originally posted by avalanchethecatwell known? evidence please.
It's a well-known fact that the most vociferous anti-gay campaigners invariably turn out to be closet-cases. Often they're not even aware of it until suddenly - BAM - craving for... well... family site 'n all that...
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt's common knowledge man, don't you even read?
well known? evidence please.
You could do your own resea... ah c'mon, you already know anyway!
Oh alright, here's some links. Start with Scientific American shall we? Lol.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=homophobes-might-be-hidden-homosexuals
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/homophobic-maybe-youre-gay.html?_r=0
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1598240
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-hari/homophobic-then-youre-pro_b_158516.html
http://www.ranker.com/list/top-10-anti-gay-activists-caught-being-gay/joanne
Originally posted by JS357the thought of introducing the element of criminality never crossed my mind, its completely alien to our thinking. Have you never been to Amsterdam? they have some of the most liberal views on what is appropriate behaviour and what is not. I suspect that religion plays a strong role in American politics though, even if its not legal to favour one creed over another. America seems to me to have somehow harboured and respected religious ideals which I suspect are a consequence of respect for its founding fathers. The British have too, but it tends to be marginalised. It seems to me to be fairly polarised in fact as far as i can discern, but Europe is different, they have different traditions, a different history, some notable revolutions which has shaped ones thinking.
Thank you for your reply. It is not entirely satisfying to my American temperament but I think I understand your reticence. I hope you can appreciate that there are people who, if in agreement with your condemnation of these practices, will want to implement their condemnation via government. I hope you can see situations when you need to make it clear ...[text shortened]... other activities, favor the principles of one religion over the principles of other religions.
Originally posted by avalanchethecatLOL, pure conjecture, unadulterated and blatant.
It's common knowledge man, don't you even read?
You could do your own resea... ah c'mon, you already know anyway!
Oh alright, here's some links. Start with Scientific American shall we? Lol.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=homophobes-might-be-hidden-homosexuals
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/homophobic-ma ...[text shortened]... _b_158516.html
http://www.ranker.com/list/top-10-anti-gay-activists-caught-being-gay/joanne
Originally posted by robbie carrobie
LOL, pure conjecture, unadulterated and blatant.
In 1996, three scientists from the University of Georgia -- Henry E. Adams, Ph.D., Lester W. Wright Jr., Ph.D., and Bethany Lohr -- published a study called "Is Homophobia Associated With Homosexual Arousal?" in the Journal of Abnormal Psychology, published by the American Psychological Association.
The study involved twenty-nine nonhomophobic men and thirty-five homophobic men...All sixty-four men described themselves as completely straight. Each man was shown three kinds of videotapes: heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian.
...here's where it gets interesting. While watching the male homosexual videos, the homophobic men were more than twice as likely to be aroused as the nonhomophobic men -- 54 to 24 percent. Only 20% of the homophobic men showed little or no arousal while watching the homosexual videos.
Conjecture? The lady doth protest too much, methinks
Originally posted by avalanchethecatI don't endorse any particular statistics on how many well known homophobes are gay, but this is priceless.
It's a well-known fact that the most vociferous anti-gay campaigners invariably turn out to be closet-cases. Often they're not even aware of it until suddenly - BAM - craving for... well... family site 'n all that...
Gay homophobe song