02 Jun '22 09:19>
@fmf saidI accept there are no rights to own weapons of mass destruction; however, there
Do you accept that there must be some limitations on the arms you are permitted to keep and bear?
are rights to own guns.
@fmf saidI accept there are no rights to own weapons of mass destruction; however, there
Do you accept that there must be some limitations on the arms you are permitted to keep and bear?
@kellyjay saidYour constitution doesn't say "guns".
I accept there are no rights to own weapons of mass destruction; however, there
are rights to own guns.
@fmf said🙂 That the old that word is not in the Bible argument?
Your constitution doesn't say "guns".
@kellyjay saidFMF is correct, the US constitution dose not mention “guns” is says the right to bear arms.
🙂 That the old that word is not in the Bible argument?
@kellyjay saidNope. It's that old the word in the constitution is arms and not guns "argument".
That the old that word is not in the Bible argument?
@kellyjay saidDo you think toddlers have the right "to keep and bear arms"? Do you think the mentally ill have the right "to keep and bear arms"? Do you think murderers who've served their time have the right "to keep and bear arms"? Do you think people with senile dementia have the right "to keep and bear arms"? Do you think school children have the right "to keep and bear arms" and bring them onto school campuses?
Regulating my rights means altering them from what they are to something less,
that is taking away rights by regulating them.
@kellyjay saidDo you have the right to keep and bear an Uzi submachine gun that can fire 600 bullets in 60 seconds or an FN P90 that can fire more than 1,000 bullets in 60 seconds? Do you have the right to use uranium tipped bullets and dumdum bullets? Do you have the right to keep and bear a bazooka and an RPG?
I accept there are no rights to own weapons of mass destruction; however, there
are rights to own guns.
@divegeester saidI imagine quite a few looking into history. Many people are killed with rocks, knives,
FMF is correct, the US constitution dose not mention “guns” is says the right to bear arms.
Yesterday you were about to remind me how many school shootings there have been which were carried out using “bows & arrows”.
How many innocent school children have been murdered by an arrow Kellyjay?
@fmf saidWell, tell me, what does the law say?
Do you think toddlers have the right "to keep and bear arms"? Do you think the mentally ill have the right "to keep and bear arms"? Do you think murderers who've served their time have the right "to keep and bear arms"? Do you think people with senile dementia have the right "to keep and bear arms"? Do you think school children have the right "to keep and bear arms" and bring them onto school campuses?
@kellyjay saidI am asking you if you agree with such regulations and limitations. I am not asking you to ask me an evasive counter-question.
Well, tell me, what does the law say?
@fmf saidIn the USA I think we only get to see such images if they are of dead children in other countries.
I'd be interested in this question being discussed from a spiritual, religious, or philosophical point of view rather than how it would be tackled on the Debates Forum ... and it's too serious and gruesome for any other forum.
If the media showed the American people, in graphic detail, on TV, and with the permission of the parents involved, of course, the bodies of elementary ...[text shortened]... and did so every time this kind of thing happened, would it shift the gun safety/regulation debate?
@fmf saidWhat laws apply? If you take your kids out to shoot and learn the about gun safety it would be depend on those involved the comfort level of the parent and the level of maturity of the child.
I am asking you if you agree with such regulations and limitations. I am not asking you to ask me an evasive counter-question.
@kellyjay saidCounter-questions about the "law" are a disingenuous dodge, KellyJay.
What laws apply?
@kellyjay saidDo you think that your right to "keep and bear arms" along with your children's right to "keep and bear arms" should be limited in so far as there is mandatory gun safety training and adjudication of the child's "level of maturity"?
If you take your kids out to shoot and learn the about gun safety it would be depend on those involved the comfort level of the parent and the level of maturity of the child.
@fmf saidI think the right to bear arms is a birthright; if you want to put rules or tests in
Do you think that your right to "keep and bear arms" along with your children's right to "keep and bear arms" should be limited in so far as there is mandatory gun safety training and adjudication of the child's "level of maturity"?