1 edit
-Removed-Not at all. In the U.S. Christians still try to get Biblical creationism taught in schools:
https://www.aclu.org/news/religious-liberty/west-virginia-lawmakers-are-pushing-public-schools-to-teach-creationism
At one point the Supreme Court had to strike down a Louisiana law that banned the teaching of evolution unless creationism was also taught. It's not some fringe group of Christians that believe this; according to Gallup, a whopping 40% of Americans believe in Biblical creation:
https://news.gallup.com/poll/261680/americans-believe-creationism.aspx
-Removed-1 Because in the new testament it is in quotes
2 They obviously could not quote him . Probably made up nonsense . Please check the dates given to the authors writings and go find 200 year old writers. It is not just a claim but a fact . You can educate yourself by looking for a book on the historicity of Jesus by Richard Carrier . It is the first book in over a century which passed peer review . You do know what peer review is ?
@caissad4 saidHow does genetics disprove any of the things you claim it disproves?
There was no Adam and Eve (genetics proves that ) . No garden of Eden , no talking snake , no tree of of the knowledge of good and evil . And definitely no Original Sin . No Job . No Jonah living in the belly of the whale . No Noah and the great flood (geology , archaeology , and genetics disprove that ) . No Exodus (Israeli archaeologists proved that in both 1949 and 1967 ) ...[text shortened]... right to believe any nonsense you choose to believe but don't act like it is actual truth or proof .
@caissad4 saidYou made a claim, it is in the title of the OP, and you expanded on it. I'm asking why you said it, what is it about genetics that disproves those things you mention, some of which have nothing to do with genetics? What is your reasoning? You can share your reasoning without worrying about my mind being closed, your claims, what is the rationale for your statement?
Oh dear . Open that deliberate closed mind of yours and read up on genetics . Your comment only makes your deliberate ignorance even more obvious .