@Eladar
Your problem lies in the fact that you believe what you believe is the superior belief that others must also accept as most likely.
a. You have no idea what my problem is.
b. My beliefs about the events as told in the Book of Genesis and the propagation of light and how old the Earth is are supported by the preponderance of empirical evidence; your beliefs in these matters are not.
c. This does not mean that I think my beliefs are "superior"; that is your own attitude peeking through, not mine.
d. I don't say here or anywhere else that anyone must believe what I believe, or that people must believe what the preponderance of evidence indicates. You are entirely at liberty to take a literalist view of the Book of Genesis; it's no skin off my nose.
e. I maintain that those who believe something radically incompatible with what the preponderance of evidence indicates cannot also claim that whatever it is they believe is rationally defensible. Believe what you believe on faith, if that is what you want to call it, but if you want to entertain a rational discussion about a literalist interpretation of the Book of Genesis, then I and other posters here expect you to present something more cogent than:
If you find that people do not wish to be around you due to your arrogance, I just told you why.
Whether people wish to be around me is irrelevant.
You are far from being alone around here.
How many others believe what I believe is irrelevant.
In Europe it is a way of life. In the US it is common enough.
Where they live who believe what I believe is irrelevant.
In other words, give me some
rational reason to believe that God created the universe and everything in it just this morning right after breakfast, including false memories of last night and bogus evidence of the Battle of Trafalgar which never really happened. If you can give me a rational reason to believe that, then I'll believe that God created all the galaxies and the light from stars billions and billions of ly away and the Earth and all the life forms on it in a period corresponding to 6x 24 hours, about 6,000 years ago, with trees in the Garden of Eden which had growth rings from years past which never happened — it's the same magic trick in both scenarios.