- Joined
- 25 Nov 21
- Moves
- 1990
@divegeester saidWho cares about your “poo list?”
Don’t flatter yourself runt.
I have an honest answer to any questions put to me. However you have slipped down my poo list yet again and I have no interest in your vacuous pretentious posing.
You’re so full of yourself it’s hilarious.
Are you leaving this site in 2022 as promised? I’ll gladly become a paid subscriber once you and your “poo list” have hit the bricks.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 28795
@pb1022 saidThis is a highly illogical post.
When you believe (as I do) that the Holy Bible is the inerrant, infallible and immutable Word of God, you realize that a human’s pea brain is not capable of discerning what is true or false and therefore your claim of “confirmation bias” sails right out the window.
Put in more understandable terms, your idea of “confirmation bias” assumes the truth can be known by the pea brain of humans, and that just ain’t the case.
Therefore, your OP is fatally flawed.
You are also human and by your own definition are unable to discern what is true or false. On what basis then can you claim 'the Holy Bible is the inerrant, infallible and immutable Word of God'?
31 Dec 21
@divegeester saidNow there's an honest answer to a straightforward question.
Give me one good reason why I should tell you?
Hypocrisy in action.
31 Dec 21
@divegeester saidSo what?
Again, I’m not interested in you. I’m less interested in you than I am in anyone else in this forum.
If you're trying to make me feel bad you'll have to hit me in the back of the head with a 2by4.
- Joined
- 25 Nov 21
- Moves
- 1990
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI can certainly discern what appears to be true and what appears to be false. I should have been clearer in saying I was referring to absolute truths.
This is a highly illogical post.
You are also human and by your own definition are unable to discern what is true or false. On what basis then can you claim 'the Holy Bible is the inerrant, infallible and immutable Word of God'?
And I can make that claim about the Holy Bible due to its content but *most importantly* because that revelation is spiritually discerned.
“But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.”
(1 Corinthians 2:14)
- Joined
- 25 Nov 21
- Moves
- 1990
@divegeester saidPlease permit me to have that coveted spot.
Again, I’m not interested in you. I’m less interested in you than I am in anyone else in this forum.
31 Dec 21
@fmf saidMore confirmation bias.
An example of a so-called 'echo chamber' would be a readers' comments section on a right-wing blog where non-right-wing comments were routinely deleted. Or, a WhatsApp chat group for supporters of a certain religious faction or sect where dissenters' memberships are revoked if they 'don't fit' in terms of the ideology espoused. Another thing, adjacent to the 'echo chamber' effect, would be where an atheist only reads books about atheism.
Bravo.
31 Dec 21
@divegeester saidWell, that is exceedingly better than conjuring up a scornful OP that poses as intellectual.
Your snide comment fits better in this thread doesn’t it; looks less like you’ve just rocked up into a brand new thread to post some scorn when you do it a few pages in.
