23 Jan '19 03:57>
@suzianne saidPerhaps you did, but you're not even close.
Perhaps I just read more of his posts on his site regarding this
It seems more like you need to read them all, and quite likely, multiple times.
@suzianne saidPerhaps you did, but you're not even close.
Perhaps I just read more of his posts on his site regarding this
@edward-palamar saidOkay, then, since you seem to be here more or less regularly, I'll ask you straight up.
Perhaps you did, but you're not even close.
It seems more like you need to read them all, and quite likely, multiple times.
@edward-palamar saidLet's hear it, then. To which prophecy do you refer?
That was specific to another prophecy aside from the Book of Daniel.
Its discovery served its purpose in that regard.
@edward-palamar saidWho in their right mind would do that? The stuff on your blog is a mishmash of rambling nonsense about the book of Daniel interspersed with incoherent waffling and wads of tedious repetition.
Perhaps you did, but you're not even close.
It seems more like you need to read them all, and quite likely, multiple times.
@divegeester saidSomeone in their right mind.
Who in their right mind would do that?
@suzianne saidNot okay.
Okay,
@suzianne saidI found it through search and study, so can you.
Let's hear it, then. To which prophecy do you refer?
@edward-palamar saidWe do know that you bored us with a countdown that went absolutely nowhere.
Not okay.
You don't know me, you don't know my family, and Jesus teaches to call no man your father, so it is highly doubtful that you know Jesus, the "Lord" in the title of this topic.
Keep looking up, though, you're getting to know Him.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidAs per your use of "we" in your post, I assure you, there is no "we" in that regard; you're delusional.
We
@edward-palamar saidAre you genuinely oblivious to the tedium you brought to the regular posters in this forum? To justify the use of 'we' would you like a group vote of the issue?
As per your use of "we" in your post, I assure you, there is no "we" in that regard; you're delusional.
@sonship saidYour link, though, speaks rightly of the "presence".
The "Day of the Lord" should not be considered as a typical 24 hour "day".
It will make no sense to read a typical solar day into every expression of the day of the Lord or the day of God in the Bible.
The best footnote on the day of the Lord I know
@edward-palamar saidYes, we.
As per your use of "we" in your post, I assure you, there is no "we" in that regard; you're delusional.
@edward-palamar saidYep....we don't get it.
As per your use of "we" in your post, I assure you, there is no "we" in that regard; you're delusional.
@edward-palamar saidWell we are all still here nearly a month after your prediction all came to a massive anticlimax. Life is going on as usual everywhere, except in your head it seems.
Someone in their right mind.