1. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    03 Feb '23 07:211 edit
    @Metal-Brain
    You? Well programmed by your god Putin.

    https://gizmodo.com/antinuclei-cern-physics-antimatter-alice-1849883833
  2. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    03 Feb '23 14:54
    @sonhouse said
    @Metal-Brain
    You? Well programmed by your god Putin.

    https://gizmodo.com/antinuclei-cern-physics-antimatter-alice-1849883833
    Scientists claim that antimatter is the costliest material to make. In 2006, Gerald Smith estimated $250 million could produce 10 milligrams of positrons (equivalent to $25 billion per gram); in 1999, NASA gave a figure of $62.5 trillion per gram of antihydrogen.

    Several studies funded by the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts are exploring whether it might be possible to use magnetic scoops to collect the antimatter that occurs naturally in the Van Allen belt of the Earth, and ultimately, the belts of gas giants, like Jupiter, hopefully at a lower cost per gram.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter
  3. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    14 Feb '23 14:06
    @Metal-Brain
    Wow, telling us something we already knew. That is not the way you get AM, the only way is the chicken wire mechanism which is still theoretical. Not sure how many times we said that. It has to be developed and that won't happen till we need much more power in our rockets to get to places in the solar system without taking years to get there.
    When we get to the point where we see the need to develop that stuff it will be in the air.

    So you don't need to keep proving how impossible it is to get AM.
    We KNOW all about it.
    Of course that won't stop you from putting out yet more posts showing how impossible it is to get AM.
  4. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    14 Feb '23 21:28
    @sonhouse said
    @Metal-Brain
    Wow, telling us something we already knew. That is not the way you get AM, the only way is the chicken wire mechanism which is still theoretical. Not sure how many times we said that. It has to be developed and that won't happen till we need much more power in our rockets to get to places in the solar system without taking years to get there.
    When we get to th ...[text shortened]... f course that won't stop you from putting out yet more posts showing how impossible it is to get AM.
    "So you don't need to keep proving how impossible it is to get AM."

    Then why are you suggesting the impossible?
  5. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9549
    15 Feb '23 04:41
    @metal-brain said
    Zerohedge is one of the best news websites there is.

    Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins were extremely interested in a zerohedge article reporting about covid being genetically modified. It was so interesting they had to redact what they discussed about that zerohedge article. It is literally a big secret.

    The April 16 email from Collins had "conspiracy gains moment ...[text shortened]... ps://www.zerohedge.com/health/coronavirus-hiv-mutation-suggests-nearly-1000x-more-likely-sars-infect
    it's literally anonymous news. that's their business model. make ad money by posting any random blog as "news".

    We can't call that real news. Fauci himself might be posting "news" there and you wouldn't know.
  6. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    16 Feb '23 21:51
    @wildgrass said
    it's literally anonymous news. that's their business model. make ad money by posting any random blog as "news".

    We can't call that real news. Fauci himself might be posting "news" there and you wouldn't know.
    What are you talking about?
    What is called anonymous news and what does that have to do with what I was talking about?
  7. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9549
    21 Feb '23 04:16
    @metal-brain said
    What are you talking about?
    What is called anonymous news and what does that have to do with what I was talking about?
    The website zerohedge is an aggregate of anonymously posted news stories. Tyler durden is not a real person.
  8. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    21 Feb '23 15:11
    @wildgrass said
    The website zerohedge is an aggregate of anonymously posted news stories. Tyler durden is not a real person.
    That is not true.

    What is the source of your misinformation?
  9. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9549
    21 Feb '23 23:371 edit
    @metal-brain said
    That is not true.

    What is the source of your misinformation?
    Tyler Durden is a character from the movie Fight club starring Brad Pitt and Edward Norton.

    Even in the movie this character is made up. An alternate personality. So he's like double fictional.
  10. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    22 Feb '23 16:532 edits
    @wildgrass said
    Tyler Durden is a character from the movie Fight club starring Brad Pitt and Edward Norton.

    Even in the movie this character is made up. An alternate personality. So he's like double fictional.
    Interesting, but he is American and was born in Bulgaria. Not Russian as some have claimed.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Ivandjiiski

    What does this prove?

    https://thehill.com/homenews/media/594312-zero-hedge-says-accusations-of-spreading-russian-propaganda-false/
  11. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9549
    01 Mar '23 05:341 edit
    @metal-brain said
    Interesting, but he is American and was born in Bulgaria. Not Russian as some have claimed.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Ivandjiiski

    What does this prove?

    https://thehill.com/homenews/media/594312-zero-hedge-says-accusations-of-spreading-russian-propaganda-false/
    If a reporter wants to stand by their reporting, they should use their real name.

    In this case, the writer chose to use a name of a character in a movie who was made up by a character in a movie. I'm not sure this person should be trusted with reliable information.
  12. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    01 Mar '23 13:49
    @wildgrass said
    If a reporter wants to stand by their reporting, they should use their real name.

    In this case, the writer chose to use a name of a character in a movie who was made up by a character in a movie. I'm not sure this person should be trusted with reliable information.
    You know his real name. It isn't a big secret.

    The articles speak for themselves. If you can prove any of the articles wrong let me know. Until then I would have to conclude you have a problem with the truth. It isn't my fault you think the truth is too ugly to be true. Newsflash: reality is ugly. If you cannot handle the truth watch NBC nightly news. They will not mention that officials intentionally set fire to the vinyl chloride and that fire creates dioxin and phosgene. That way you can live in blissful ignorance because that is what you want.
  13. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    01 Mar '23 20:12
    @wildgrass said
    If a reporter wants to stand by their reporting, they should use their real name.

    In this case, the writer chose to use a name of a character in a movie who was made up by a character in a movie. I'm not sure this person should be trusted with reliable information.
    Zakk Wylde is Jeffrey Phillip Wielandt.
    Paul Stanley is Stanley Bert Eisen.

    Lots of people choose another name that is easier to remember. Paul Stanley told Paul Charles Caravello they could not have 2 Pauls in the band so he had to change his name to Eric Carr. Music business....
  14. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    02 Mar '23 00:145 edits
    @Metal-Brain
    because you are plain too stupid to understand the physics of what I described.
    AM particles are most likely to be ionized, which means they can be controlled by magnetic and electric fields.
    Is there something about THAT you don't understand?
    In every 11 odd tons of interstellar gas there is one gram of AM. Free floating mixed with the cloud of regular matter and they don't touch because the particles are flying around with a lot of space between particles so they don't interact much.
    And for every ten billion tons of regular matter flying around in space there is one ton of AM.
    Do you have a problem with THAT?
    One gram of AM would get like 20 SLS rockets into orbit.
    You need to regrow some neurons to increase you imagination quotient.
    The physics of gathering AM is clear and will no doubt be used in another hundred years or so when space travel gets over the present hurdles and becomes a commercial enterprise with cheap flights to space.
  15. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    02 Mar '23 08:44
    @sonhouse said
    @Metal-Brain
    because you are plain too stupid to understand the physics of what I described.
    AM particles are most likely to be ionized, which means they can be controlled by magnetic and electric fields.
    Is there something about THAT you don't understand?
    In every 11 odd tons of interstellar gas there is one gram of AM. Free floating mixed with the cloud of regular mat ...[text shortened]... ravel gets over the present hurdles and becomes a commercial enterprise with cheap flights to space.
    Once again, how are you going to prevent the first AM explosion from blowing AM back into your space ship? The only way to prevent that is to only release one atom of AM at a time. Your ship would move like a turtle.

    You have the choice of blowing yourself up or going nowhere fast. You need to resolve that problem. You have done nothing but repeat yourself without resolving anything. You cannot have an antimatter stream. It would result in blowback. Stop pretending that isn't a big problem.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree