Originally posted by FMFI don't know why you are attempting to feign ignorance, just answer the question, in your guise as a women do you think its conceivable that you duped any minors in view of the fact that this site allows anyone over the age of thirteen to join.
"Duped" in what way? Minors? What are you talking about? Is this part of some supposed comedy routine?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBut your view on what should happen when reporting is not mandatory is not the same as your organization's view. How can you have "no issues" in a situation like that, especially when it is about protection and justice for children?
No i have not written to anyone. I have no issues.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie"Duped minors"? Give me an example of what it is you are imagining?
I don't know why you are attempting to feign ignorance, just answer the question, in your guise as a women do you think its conceivable that you duped any minors in view of the fact that this site allows anyone over the age of thirteen to join.
Originally posted by FMFNo it was a reference to the wikipedia article quoted by Handy Andy, oh dear, infact two posts up on page 228 I even state that i have not read any reports. Why are you so self assuming FMF, don't you think you might do better if you didn't assume anything, I do.
But on page 228 of this thread you did.
Originally posted by FMFJust answer the question in your guise as a women do you think it conceivable that you may have duped any minors because the site allows anyone over the age of thirteen to join. You keep dodging the question FMF.
"Duped minors"? Give me an example of what it is you are imagining?
Originally posted by FMFI have no issues with the brothers, i know the hard work and unpaid labour that they put in to protect the congregation from unwholesome influences. If there is a genuine case of abuse i think the brothers will report it.
But your view on what should happen when reporting is not mandatory is not the same as your organization's view. How can you have "no issues" in a situation like that, especially when it is about protection and justice for children?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo you contributed countless posts on a 15 page thread about this article:
No it was a reference to the wikipedia article quoted by Handy Andy, oh dear, infact two posts up on page 228 I even state that i have not read any reports. Why are you so self assuming FMF, don't you think you might do better if you didn't assume anything, I do.
http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/dec/01/jehovahs-witnesses-fostered-distrust-of-secular-authority-royal-commission-counsel
...and you didn't actually read the article that the thread was about?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI don't know what you mean by "duped minors". I think you're just trying to be funny.
Just answer the question in your guise as a women do you think it conceivable that you may have duped any minors because the site allows anyone over the age of thirteen to join. You keep dodging the question FMF.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHow can you have "no issues" when your opinion on how to protect children from being raped and subjected to other sexual abuse is significantly different from the instruction - that you quoted - given out by your organization?
I have no issues with the brothers, i know the hard work and unpaid labour that they put in to protect the congregation from unwholesome influences. If there is a genuine case of abuse i think the brothers will report it.
