- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 117604
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyYou do realise that what you have copy/pasted is a bloggers view of people who troll and criticise the work of online writers..don't you...?
https://havewehadhelp.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/internet-trolls-what-is-their-problem/
Do you consider your posts here to be work that is "publishable"? Do you think that those here who are unimpressed by your posting are "failed authors"?
Originally posted by divegeesterFailed authors with fouled diapers.
You do realise that what you have copy/pasted is a bloggers view of people who troll and criticise the work of online writers..don't you...?
Do you consider your posts here to be work that is "publishable"? Do you think that those here who are unimpressed by your posting are "failed authors"?
Originally posted by divegeesterPlease note that the titled of this review is "Internet Trolls – what is their problem?" Its focus is the book publishing industry with examples of "failed authors" whose abnormal behavior is defined and categorized as "Internet Trolls". These writers illustrate emotional frustrations and unresolved issues attributed to the rejection of their intellectual work product. Internet Trolls on Red Hot Pawn may have different emotional frustrations and unresolved issues yet behave in an identical way. I'm aware of only two RHP Members who are published authors: moonbus and Tony. If my objective was to publish a book, I certainly wouldn't be here at 10;26pm typing this reply to you. My primary interest is chess and conversation. What may I ask is your primary interest in being here?
You do realise that what you have copy/pasted is a bloggers view of people who troll and criticise the work of online writers..don't you...?
Do you consider your posts here to be work that is "publishable"? Do you think that those here who are unimpressed by your posting are "failed authors"?
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 117604
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyIt seems an incongruent source to cite considering this is a casual chess forum and 99% of the posters have never published work.
Please note that the titled of this review is "Internet Trolls – what is their problem?" Its focus is the book publishing industry with examples of "failed authors" whose abnormal behavior is defined and categorized as "Internet Trolls". These writers illustrate emotional frustrations and unresolved issues attributed to the rejection of their intellectu ...[text shortened]... mary interest is chess and conversation. What may I ask is your primary interest in being here?
Nonetheless....You have classified yourself as a troll in the past; do you them share the embolded attributes you have highlighted such as anger and spleen venting?
Who here at RHP do you think exhibits these characteristics in thier posts?
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyI think you simply classify people you dislike or disapprove of as "trolls", and posts that express disagreement with you, that call you out for your hypocrisy or pomposity ~ or that ask you questions or make points you are unable or unwilling to answer ~ as "trolling". What's more, I think you are incapable of disguising the fact that this is your personal agenda.
[b]"Top definition:
troll
One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board
with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument.
by Alien Entity September 22, 2002
Thumbs Up: 16,314Thumbs Down: 3,452"
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=troll[/b]
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyIn my own view, Red Hot Pawn Public Forum Thumbs Up and Thumbs Down more often than not strike a responsive chord. Recipients of the new Thumbs Up Notifications are liked pleased that at least three people appreciate or approve or agree with their post. Alternatively, noticing three or more Thumbs Down would likely cause any rational recipients to wonder if they had correctly gone against the grain causing an emotional knee jerk reaction or if they had wandered off into some three sigma cemetery of being dead wrong, hopefully causing them to rethink their position on the topic under discussion..
"Top definition:
troll
One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board
with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument.
by Alien Entity September 22, 2002
Thumbs Up: 16,314Thumbs Down: 3,452"
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=troll
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 117604
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyWhat is it with you and your cronies - this obsession over "thumbs". Give it a rest ffs!
In my own view, Red Hot Pawn Public Forum Thumbs Up and Thumbs Down more often than not strike a responsive chord. Recipients of the new Thumbs Up Notifications are liked pleased that at least three people appreciate or approve or agree with their post. Alternatively, noticing three or more Thumbs Down would likely cause any rational recipients to wonde ...[text shortened]... ing dead wrong, hopefully causing them to rethink their position on the topic under discussion..
15 Dec 15
Originally posted by FMF"Thumbs Up: 16,314Thumbs Down: 3,452" + your 1 = 3,453
I think you simply classify people you dislike or disapprove of as "trolls", and posts that express disagreement with you, that call you out for your hypocrisy or pomposity ~ or that ask you questions or make points you are unable or unwilling to answer ~ as "trolling". What's more, I think you are incapable of disguising the fact that this is your personal agenda.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyAbout @Frank-Burns "Last moved 625 days 16 hours and 53 minutes ago."
"Top definition:
troll
One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board
with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument.
by Alien Entity September 22, 2002
Thumbs Up: 16,314Thumbs Down: 3,452"
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=troll
This is what your Red Hot Pawn Profile will have for header information if you're ever given a Maximum Ban. So think twice before you click [Post].