Go back
We've been hosed by Greta's End of the World Prediction

We've been hosed by Greta's End of the World Prediction

Debates


@jimmac said
That being true has nought to do with the "FACTS". If it was not deleted, it should have been. What an embarrassment. But then, these these happen so often, this crowd just pushes it to one side and keeps plodding on regardless.
Eagerly awaiting the next "fail".
You’re the fukking embarrassment, dude.

A 15 year old, or as we in society call them, a kid, exaggerates a scientific fact for melodramatic purposes, and suddenly, the incel in you has to let off steam.

Get a fukking life.


And I had spent a lot of money on an Ark. Anyone want to buy an ark, cheap?


@no1marauder said
Unsurprisingly gullible right wingers have been duped again:

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-did-greta-thunberg-delete-claim-that-humanity-will-end-2023-1787420
Hey Earl, are you gonna own up to the fact that you've been "hosed" by right-wingers?


@vivify said
Hey Earl, are you gonna own up to the fact that you've been "hosed" by right-wingers?
Lol they made it up.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
And I had spent a lot of money on an Ark. Anyone want to buy an ark, cheap?
With, or without, the animals, Mo?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
@Earl-of-Trumps
The corporate news media promoted so much fear alarmists have become a doomsday cult. They drank the cool aid.
It's Kool-Aid®.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@earl-of-trumps said
@Metal-Brain

The leftists deride the preacher spewing fire and brimstone but the reality is,
the leftists love the lib spokesperson that puts fear into the huddled, gullible masses.
That's pretty damned funny coming from a proponent of The Fear Party, AKA The GOP.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@suzianne said
With, or without, the animals, Mo?
Perfectly matched pairs, all cis, so there will be no eruptions or disruptions such as we humans are bringing on. I do discriminate against hyenas, and snakes of the poisonous variety.


@vivify said
Hey Earl, are you gonna own up to the fact that you've been "hosed" by right-wingers?
why did she delete the tweet?

typical biased lib “truth tellers” trying to work their magic…


@shavixmir said
You’re the fukking embarrassment, dude.

A 15 year old, or as we in society call them, a kid, exaggerates a scientific fact for melodramatic purposes, and suddenly, the incel in you has to let off steam.

Get a fukking life.
Really, dude, This 15 yr old that the climate clowns put front and center of their propaganda machine??
You are right, a nut job 15 yr old, but that is a little besides the point. A kid that is ( was ) worshiped by the climate nutters, making yet another false prediction that none of her minders corrected her about because "they" love spreading fear. They then quite happily ignore the fact that they are continually proven wrong on so many fronts.
And this "kid", that you tell me has a belief system that can understandably get this so wrong, and who's belief system is reinforced by those around her, can make this mistake "because" she is a kid, can get gender affirming surgery if the "experts" affirm her belief system and that is ok.
You cannot have it both ways. I am at least consistent, And that is, in 'BOTH" cases, it is inappropriate to affirm her belief system. You seem to have a bob each way.


@jimmac said
And???? How and, if so, so what, it was quoting an article and its premise was factual, yes??.
The doomsday prediction, once again, sigh, did NOT come to pass.
It was referencing an article that didn't say what you nutjobs say it said.

Gullible. All of you.


@suzianne said
It was referencing an article that didn't say what you nutjobs say it said.

Gullible. All of you.
Again, not the damn point, not at all, it is irrelevant as to weather the article is true or not.
Did the prediction come true or not, NO, like so many before it, false.
And lets just forget the rest of his post shall we, highlighting the fact that she got it wrong. That is the point of the post, yes?, get it, ok, clear now?.
Can you admit she was totally 100% wrong? "That" was the main crux of the post. removing " now deleted" from earls post changes NOTHING about the post. except in technical terms, yep, if you want to be pedantic, oh thats right you are being pedantic.
If she has not deleted her (now) embarrassing tweet, maybe she should, hmmm.


@suzianne said
It was referencing an article that didn't say what you nutjobs say it said.

Gullible. All of you.
Greta said the human race had five years to end fossil fuels or face certain death.
Were you gullible enough to believe her?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@jimmac said
Again, not the damn point, not at all, it is irrelevant as to weather the article is true or not.
Did the prediction come true or not, NO, like so many before it, false.
And lets just forget the rest of his post shall we, highlighting the fact that she got it wrong. That is the point of the post, yes?, get it, ok, clear now?.
Can you admit she was totally 100% wrong? "Tha ...[text shortened]... ou are being pedantic.
If she has not deleted her (now) embarrassing tweet, maybe she should, hmmm.
So now you cranks are judging people on stuff they never said?

Settle down, Jethro.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
Greta said the human race had five years to end fossil fuels or face certain death.
Were you gullible enough to believe her?
Liar.

What is wrong with you people?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.