@vivify
I said show me a poll and the poll questions. Admit you cannot do it without ruining your own credibility.
The author of the article from Forbes gave you facts. Attacking the author does not prove him wrong. Attack the facts if you can.
@metal-brain saidI posted two credible sources: the New York Times and Washington Post. Go argue with them.
@vivify
I said show me a poll and the poll questions. Admit you cannot do it without ruining your own credibility.
The author of the article from Forbes gave you facts. Attacking the author does not prove him wrong. Attack the facts if you can.
@vivify saidFor the third time, post a poll!
I posted two credible sources: the New York Times and Washington Post. Go argue with them.
All you are posting is opinion pieces because no poll exists to back up your misinformation. You were duped.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/02/climate_consensus_con_game.html
1 edit
@metal-brain saidNeither one of those articles were opinion pieces. They were reporting what scientists have found.
All you are posting is opinion pieces
@vivify saidWhat scientists? What kind of scientists?
Neither one of those articles were opinion pieces. They were reporting what scientists have found.
If you want to prove a consensus you have to prove what all climate scientists think, not a few cherry picked alarmist unqualified scientists. If they are not climate scientists they are not experts, are they?
Show me a poll with the poll questions. If you cannot do that you cannot prove consensus. And make sure they are qualified climate scientists, not scientists who know nothing about climate. But if you want to include scientists that are not climate scientists merely because you think they are really smart then how about the brilliant scientist the late Freeman Dyson?
https://e360.yale.edu/features/freeman_dyson_takes_on_the_climate_establishment
@metal-brain saidThere's is consensus:
What scientists? What kind of scientists?
If you want to prove a consensus you have to prove what all climate scientists think, not a few cherry picked alarmist unqualified scientists. If they are not climate scientists they are not experts, are they?
Show me a poll with the poll questions. If you cannot do that you cannot prove consensus. And make sure they are qual ...[text shortened]... te Freeman Dyson?
https://e360.yale.edu/features/freeman_dyson_takes_on_the_climate_establishment
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
"Our AMA ... supports the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s fourth assessment report and concurs with the scientific consensus that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that anthropogenic contributions are significant."
"Earth's changing climate is a critical issue and poses the risk of significant environmental, social and economic disruptions around the globe. While natural sources of climate variability are significant, multiple lines of evidence indicate that human influences have had an increasingly dominant effect on global climate warming observed since the mid-twentieth century."
@metal-brain saidHey halfwit show us your evidence that humanity is not in peril. Humanity is dying all over the globe of extreme weather events, unless you think humanity means that 10 square meters around you.
So she basically said humanity's existence in peril because 5 years has passed.
Do you agree with her that humanity's existence is now in peril?
Man made climate change is killing humans somewhere everyday
@vivify saidConsensus of what?
There's is consensus:
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/"Our AMA ... supports the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s fourth assessment report and concurs with the scientific consensus that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that anthropogenic contributions are significant."
"Earth's changing climate i ...[text shortened]... asingly dominant effect on global climate warming observed since the mid-twentieth century."
We all know climate change is real. The ice ages prove that. Climate change has always happened and still is happening. What kind of idiot would deny the ice ages?
@kevcvs57 saidWhat extreme weather events? Where is your evidence?
Hey halfwit show us your evidence that humanity is not in peril. Humanity is dying all over the globe of extreme weather events, unless you think humanity means that 10 square meters around you.
Man made climate change is killing humans somewhere everyday
@metal-brain saidThey clearly cite "human influences".
Consensus of what?
We all know climate change is real. The ice ages prove that. Climate change has always happened and still is happening. What kind of idiot would deny the ice ages?
@vivify saidWho is they? What human influences? Be specific.
They clearly cite "human influences".
You still have no poll and the sites you posted have no sources listed.
There is a consensus of human influence, but only of a negligible influence that everybody agrees on. There is no consensus of catastrophic climate change. There is no poll that proves that at all.
You were duped by propaganda intended to get you to beg for a carbon tax to save the world. Ask your slave masters if they have a solution that does not involve them expropriating your money from you.
@metal-brain saidNASA lists its sources. You clearly didn't read the link.
the sites you posted have no sources listed.
@vivify saidYes and none of them are polls of climate scientists.
NASA lists its sources. You clearly didn't read the link.
Did you even look to find out?
@vivify saidYou see why I'm so good at this. Had to play a little line out to make sure vivify was on the hook. So while vivify thought the link was useful to her she was happy to go along with it, to use the information from the link to call me (and I quote) a liar.
I didn't see your graph in that long link.
Okay. Here:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-climatechange-breakingviews-idINKBN2781W6
The author of your the study in your link is by a debunked climate denier. This study wasn't done by an organization these are claims made by a single individual.
I don't know why I gave you the benefit of the doubt that y ...[text shortened]... ve suspected immediately that you'd quote a hack criticized by the rest of the scientific community.
Within hours of being proven wrong she now wishes to disregard the link only moments before she was using to slander me a liar.
And in reply to the hard stats put together by Lomborg she posts an op-ed of some lefty having a rant about Lomborg, not a refutation of the stats, but what can only be called butt hurt whining. The hit pieces from lefties are nothing new for Lomborg, his crime? he was once one of them. The ramble about Lomborg is three years old and manages to slip in something about the virtues of wuflu lock-downs.
vivify said:
"This study wasn't done by an organization these are claims made by a single individual."
What follows is a partial list of references used by Lomborg for his paper:
Abidin et al., 2011
H.Z. Abidin, H. Andreas, I. Gumilar, Y. Fukuda, Y.E. Pohan, T. Deguchi
Land subsidence of Jakarta (Indonesia) and its relation with urban development
Natural Hazards, 59 (3) (2011), pp. 1753-1771
View article CrossRefView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
Afrobarometer 2018
Afrobarometer
Taking Stock: Citizen Priorities and Assessments Three Years Into the SDGs
(2018)
Available at: http://afrobarometer.org/sites/default/files/publications/Dispatches/ab_r7_policypaperno51_africans_priorities_the_sdgs_and_govt_performance.pdf
Google Scholar
Akimoto et al., 2017
Keigo Akimoto, Fuminori Sano, Bianka Shoai Tehrani
The analyses on the economic costs for achieving the nationally determined contributions and the expected global emission pathways
Evolut. Inst. Econ. Rev., 14 (1) (2017), pp. 193-206
View article CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andela et al., 2017
N. Andela, D C Morton, L Giglio, Y Chen, G R van der Werf, P S Kasibhatla, R S DeFries, et al.
A human-driven decline in global burned area
Science, 356 (6345) (2017), pp. 1356-1362
View PDF
This article is free to access.
CrossRefView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
Andreas et al., 2018
Heri Andreas, Hasanuddin Zainal Abidin, D Pradipta, Dina Anggreni Sarsito, I Gumilar
Insight look the subsidence impact to infrastructures in Jakarta and Semarang area; key for adaptation and mitigation
MATEC Web Conf., 147 (2018), p. 8001
Google Scholar
AonBenfield 2019
AonBenfield
Weather, Climate & Catastrophe Insight: 2018 Annual Report
(2019)
Available at: http://thoughtleadership.aonbenfield.com/Documents/20190122-ab-if-annual-weather-climate-report-2018.pdf
Google Scholar
Arora and Melton, 2018
Vivek K. Arora, Joe R. Melton
Reduction in global area burned and wildfire emissions since 1930s enhances carbon uptake by land
Nat. Commun., 9 (1) (2018), p. 1326
View PDF
This article is free to access.
View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
Ashley et al., 2014
Walker S. Ashley, Stephen Strader, Troy Rosencrants, Andrew J. Krmenec
Spatiotemporal changes in Tornado hazard exposure: the case of the expanding bull's-eye effect in Chicago, Illinois
Weather Clim. Soc., 6 (2) (2014), pp. 175-193
View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
Bakkensen and Mendelsohn, 2016
Laura A. Bakkensen, Robert O. Mendelsohn
Risk and adaptation: evidence from global hurricane damages and fatalities
J. Assoc. Environ. Resource Econ., 3 (3) (2016), pp. 555-587
View article CrossRefView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
Barnett et al., 2017
G.A. Barnett, J B Ruiz, W W Xu, J-Y Park, H W Park
The world is not flat: evaluating the inequality in global information gatekeeping through website co-mentions
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 117 (2017), pp. 38-45
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
Barrett, 2012
P.M. Barrett
It’s Global Warming, Stupid
Bloomberg Businessweek, New York, NY (2012)
Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-11-01/its-global-warming-stupid
Google Scholar
BEA 2019a
BEA. 2019a. “Table 1.1.5. Gross domestic product.” Bureau of Economic Analysis. Available at: https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm.
Google Scholar
BEA 2019b
BEA. 2019b. “Table 1.1.9. Implicit price deflators for gross domestic product.” Bureau of Economic Analysis. Available at: https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm.
Google Scholar
Benichou, 2014
Benichou, Léo. 2014. E-Data of Etemad and Luciani, World Energy Production 1800–1985. Available at: http://www.tsp-data-portal.org/Energy-Production-Statistics#tspQvChart.
Google Scholar
Bohringer et al., 2009
Christoph Bohringer, Thomas F. Rutherford, Richard S.J. Tol
The EU 20/20/2020 targets: an overview of the EMF22 assessment
Energy Econ., 31 (Supplement 2) (2009), pp. S268-S273
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
Bolt et al., 2018
Bolt, Jutta, Robert Inklaar, Herman de Jong, and Jan Luiten van Zanden. 2018. Rebasing Maddison: new income comparisons and the shape of long-run economic development. Available at: https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/historicaldevelopment/maddison/releases/maddison-project-database-2018.
Google Scholar
Bourguignon, 2015
François Bourguignon
The Globalization of Inequality
Princeton University Press, Princeton : New Jersey (2015)
Google Scholar
Bourguignon and Morrisson, 2002
François Bourguignon, Christian Morrisson
Inequality among world citizens: 1820-1992
Am. Econ. Rev., 92 (4) (2002), pp. 727-744
View in ScopusGoogle Scholar
Bouwer and Jonkman, 2018
L.M. Bouwer, S.N. Jonkman
Global mortality from storm surges is decreasing
Environ. Res. Lett., 13 (14008) (2018), 10.1088/1748-9326/aa98a3
View article Google Scholar
Breyer et al., 2017
C. Breyer, S. Heinonen, J. Ruotsalainen
New consciousness: a societal and energetic vision for rebalancing humankind within the limits of planet earth
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 114 (2017), pp. 7-15
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
Broughel and Viscusi, 2017
Broughel, James, and W.Kip Viscusi. 2017. “Death by regulation: how regulations can increase mortality risk.” Available at: https://www.mercatus.org/publications/regulations-increase-mortality-risk(July 29, 2019).
Google Scholar
Bryant and Westerling, 2014
Benjamin P. Bryant, Anthony L. Westerling
Scenarios for future wildfire risk in California: links between changing demography, land use, climate, and wildfire
Environmetrics, 25 (6, SI) (2014), pp. 454-471
View article CrossRefView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
Burke et al., 2018
Marshall Burke, W. Matthew Davis, Noah S. Diffenbaugh
Large potential reduction in economic damages under un mitigation targets
Nature, 557 (7706) (2018), pp. 549-553
View article CrossRefView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
Burke et al., 2015
Marshall Burke, Solomon M. Hsiang, Edward Miguel
Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production
Nature, 527 (2015), p. 235
View article CrossRefView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
Calvin et al., 2012
Katherine Calvin, L Clarke, V Krey, G Blanford, K Jiang, M Kainuma, E Kriegler, G Luderer, P R Shukla
The role of Asia in mitigating climate change: results from the Asia modeling exercise
Energy Econ., 34 (Supplement 3) (2012), pp. S251-S260
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
Calvin et al., 2012b
Katherine Calvin, Allen Fawcett, Jiang Kejun
Comparing model results to national climate policy goals: results from the Asia modeling exercise
Energy Econ., 34 (2012), pp. S306-S315
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
Capros et al., 2008
Capros, P., L. Mantzos, V. Papandreou, and N. Tasios. 2008. Model-based analysis of the 2008 EU policy package on climate change and renewables. Available at:http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2020/docs/analysis_en.pdf.
Google Scholar
CAT 2018
CAT. 2018. Climate action tracker data. Available at:https://climateactiontracker.org/documents/509/CAT_2018-12-09_PublicData_EmissionsPathways_Dec2018update.xls.
Google Scholar
Census, 1975
Census. 1975. Historical statistics of the United States: colonial times to 1970. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Available at:https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1975/compendia/hist_stats_colonial-1970.html.
Google Scholar
Census, 1992
Census. 1992. Population of states and counties of the United States: 1790 to 1990. Available at:https://www.census.gov/population/www/censusdata/pop1790-1990.html.
Google Scholar
Census, 2010
Census. 2010. Coastline population trends in the United States: 1960 to 2008. Available at: https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2010/demo/p25-1139.html.
Google Scholar
Census, 2011
Census. 2011. Historical census of housing tables. Available at:https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/historic/units.html.
Google Scholar
Census, 2012
Census. 2012. USA counties: 2011, population. Available at:https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2011/compendia/usa-counties-2011.html.
Google Scholar
Census, 2017
Census. 2017. 2017 National population projections tables. Available at:https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2017/demo/popproj/2017-summary-tables.html.
Google Scholar
Census, 2018a
Census. 2018a. Annual estimates of housing units for the United States, regions, divisions, states, and counties: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2017. Available at:https://factfinder.census.gov/bkmk/table/1.0/en/PEP/2017/PEPANNHU.
Google Scholar
Census, 2018b
Census. 2018b. Median and average sale price of houses sold. Available at:https://www.census.gov/construction/nrs/historical_data/index.html.
Google Scholar
China NDC 2016
China NDC. 2016. China NDC submission. Available at:https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/China%20First/China%27s%20First%20NDC%20Submission.pdf
Chen et al., 2018
Wenfang Chen, Y Lu, S Sun, Y Duan, G C Leckebusch
Hazard footprint-based normalization of economic losses from tropical cyclones in China during 1983–2015...continues