07 Jul '20 14:43>
This post is unavailable.
Please refer to our posting guidelines.
The post that was quoted here has been removedI've reported you, AGAIN.
@earl-of-trumps saidTry reading the entire OP and the four distinct examples contained therein.
I've reported you, AGAIN.
If you want to accuse me of defending Neo-Nazis, first prove to me these
retailers are Neo-Nazis. So far, all you have done is draw numbers out of a hat.
If you want to converse with me, do not do so by flinging lies and insults.
Why did the DHS use the turn of phrase "out of 88"?
How can I answer when I don't even know what ...[text shortened]... zed conspiracy theories.
"admit your mistake"... lololol, sure, kaz. As soon as you prove it to me.
@joe-shmo saidPerhaps you can fare better than EoT. Why, in your view, did the DHS use the phrase "less than 13 out of 88" to refer to a fraction of a large group of people?
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/debates/hey-don%E2%80%99t-steal-my-nazi-flag.186072
EoT was the last poster. #44. Which is half of 88. I think you are on to something.
@kazetnagorra saidYou ruined it! My last post was #35, the transpose of which is 53. Added together...88!
Perhaps you can fare better than EoT. Why, in your view, did the DHS use the phrase "less than 13 out of 88" to refer to a fraction of a large group of people?
@kazetnagorra saidI thought your numbers of concern are 14 and 88.
Perhaps you can fare better than EoT. Why, in your view, did the DHS use the phrase "less than 13 out of 88" to refer to a fraction of a large group of people?
@joe-shmo saidNumerology, Joe.
I thought your numbers of concern are 14 and 88.
@kazetnagorra saidTrying proving to me that the pricer didn't choose $88 on nothing more than market forces
Try reading the entire OP and the four distinct examples contained therein.
@joe-shmo saidSo you can't think of a reason other than the one I mentioned in my OP?
I thought your numbers of concern are 14 and 88.
@kazetnagorra saidNo... I cant think of a reason other than the one you alluded to. "Could just be a coincidence..." -kazetnagorra
So you can't think of a reason other than the one I mentioned in my OP?
@joe-shmo saidDefending neo-Nazis it is, then?
No... I cant think of a reason other than the one you alluded to. "Could just be a coincidence..." -kazetnagorra
Jesbus--welcome to the "tinfoil hat" club bub...
@kazetnagorra saidListen...there is a nonzero probability that a neo-Nazi works for the Department of Homeland Security and manipulated a statistic to allude to that. Happy? There is also a greater than zero probability that there is someone of opposite ideology that works for the DHS as well. What is your point? That the DHS is racist because you've uncovered this one piece of circumstantial evidence written over
Defending neo-Nazis it is, then?
@joe-shmo saidSo there is a high likelihood that a neo-Nazi works or worked for the DHS and wrote a piece for a government website that after two years is still online. There is a high likelihood that neo-Nazis work for the Trump campaign and that they have used the inverted red triangle - a Nazi symbol designating political opponents - in ads attacking Antifa.
Listen...there is a nonzero probability that a neo-Nazi works for the Department of Homeland Security and manipulated a statistic to allude to that. Happy? There is also a greater than zero probability that there is someone of opposite ideology that works for the DHS as well. What is your point? That the DHS is racist because you've uncovered this one piece of circumstanti ...[text shortened]... all things possible" ) someone with neo-Nazi ideology manipulated to dog whistle support for Hitler?