22 Oct 17
Originally posted by @karoly-aczelOf course there are exceptions to the rule.
Yeah and I had 2 kids to two different mothers, both of whom I was the primary care giver until 7years old.
My boy is living with me full time at 12. My daughter is 21.
Just sayin' that there are many exceptions to your generalizations. I just wish you would understand that.
22 Oct 17
Originally posted by @eladarJust because he’s got a diploma, doesn’t mean he’s not a moron.
He has a PhD in the field. Do you?
It isn't like he is writing an article on astrophysics. He is writing an article on a topic for which he has his doctorate.
That being said, he’s not wrong. He’s just over-simplified a message to the extent where some people are able to draw wrong and rather absurd conclusions from it.
Sort of like Hawkings writing about quantum gravity on the lightcone and someone interpretting it as: chocolate icecream is better than vanilla and that’s just plain racist.
22 Oct 17
Originally posted by @shavixmirHe is the one interpretting his own statement.
Just because he’s got a diploma, doesn’t mean he’s not a moron.
That being said, he’s not wrong. He’s just over-simplified a message to the extent where some people are able to draw wrong and rather absurd conclusions from it.
Sort of like Hawkings writing about quantum gravity on the lightcone and someone interpretting it as: chocolate icecream is better than vanilla and that’s just plain racist.
Less than ideal females use the single mother road to get a complete man. This is what he states, not me.
22 Oct 17
Originally posted by @eladarSo am I, but abortion is not about killing babies.
I am against the killing of babies at any stage of development.
So you are against abortion yet claim that these women have choice ?
What are you getting at here? Is this a lefty thing or a mysoginist thing ?
Because you are clearly down on these women and yet if they did want to change and want to make a better life, you would deny them an abortion. Is this just so you can have another generation of unwanted children to hurl abuse at?
(Duchess: the above comments are hypothetical only, they do not represent my views)
22 Oct 17
Originally posted by @karoly-aczelAll people who are born follow the same life cycle.
So am I, but abortion is not about killing babies.
So you are against abortion yet claim that these women have choice ?
What are you getting at here? Is this a lefty thing or a mysoginist thing ?
Because you are clearly down on these women and yet if they did want to change and want to make a better life, you would deny them an abortion. Is thi ...[text shortened]... abuse at?
(Duchess: the above comments are hypothetical only, they do not represent my views)
You claim to know when a human life becomes worthy of protection.
22 Oct 17
Originally posted by @eladarYeah I do know the start of a life cycle :It begins with birth.
All people who are born follow the same life cycle.
You claim to know when a human life becomes worthy of protection.
Now are you going to tell me why you persist with this negativity towards poor women in the U.S. ?
Or are you just going to keep pushing ahead and ignoring any comments and/or questions that others are saying to you?
I'm fairly sure I have asked this of you before.
22 Oct 17
Originally posted by @karoly-aczelYou are certainly ignorant.
Yeah I do know the start of a life cycle :It begins with birth.
Now are you going to tell me why you persist with this negativity towards poor women in the U.S. ?
Or are you just going to keep pushing ahead and ignoring any comments and/or questions that others are saying to you?
I'm fairly sure I have asked this of you before.
http://www.biologyreference.com/La-Ma/Life-Cycle-Human.html
Originally posted by @shavixmirWho is more moronic, the writer who writes his opinion, or the reader who twists everything he reads to fit his own opinion? Eladar does this exact same thing with the Bible, as well. Anything to justify his warped mind. It's his M.O.
Out of everything je wrote, that’s what you take away.
See why he’s a moron?
23 Oct 17
Originally posted by @karoly-aczelDude, you make an idiotic statement requiring correction.
Dude, you snub my questions again yet leave a link?
As if I'm going to look that up. Weirdo.
23 Oct 17
Originally posted by @eladar
You are certainly ignorant.
http://www.biologyreference.com/La-Ma/Life-Cycle-Human.html
Biologists count the days of development starting from fertilization, but medical doctors count from the first day from the last menstrual period, which is about two weeks before fertilization. So, where a biologist would say the embryo's heart begins beating at three weeks, a medical doctor would say the heart begins beating at five weeks. The total time from fertilization to birth is about thirty-eight weeks. At the end of the embryonic period (eight weeks), the embryo is about 30 millimeters (just over 1 inch) long. Between three months and nine months the fetus grows until it is about twenty times as long.
At birth, the muscles of the mother's uterus begin to contract and push the baby out through the vagina.
Why does your source only use the word "baby" at birth and not before?
23 Oct 17
Originally posted by @athousandyoungI am talking about human life.
Biologists count the days of development starting from fertilization, but medical doctors count from the first day from the last menstrual period, which is about two weeks before fertilization. So, where a biologist would say the embryo's heart begins beating at three weeks, a medical doctor would say the heart begins beating at five weeks ...[text shortened]... h the vagina.
Why does your source only use the word "baby" at birth and not before?
If you want to know why they use the terms they use, ask them.