Questions about Paul Pelosi attack

@metal-brain said
"When the door was opened, Pelosi and DEPAPE were both holding a hammer with one hand and DEPAPE had his other hand holding onto Pelosi’s forearm."

That did not happen when the door was opened. That happened after the police were inside. That is a clear contradiction. Didn't you notice that?

@no1marauder
That did not happen when the door was opened. That happened after the police were inside. That is a clear contradiction. Didn't you notice that?

@metal-brain said
@no1marauder
That did not happen when the door was opened. That happened after the police were inside. That is a clear contradiction. Didn't you notice that?

@no1marauder said
""When the door was opened, Pelosi and DEPAPE were both holding a hammer with one hand and DEPAPE had his other hand holding onto Pelosi’s forearm."

You really need some remedial reading lessons.

@metal-brain said
No you do. Pelosi opened the door and let the police in. The attack happened later, not when the door was opened. It happened after the door was opened because Paul walked away from the police back to Depape.

Why don't you just admit the police report is inaccurate? Depape didn't attack Paul when the door was opened. He was attacked after the door was opened. Do you k ...[text shortened]... sic grade school reading comprehension. Stop pretending you don't understand present and past tense.

@no1marauder said
You're quite out of your mind. The Criminal Complaint is quite specific; your reliance on an article retracted weeks ago is insane. Your continued insistence on insisting a news article (that the source admitted was inaccurate) is right and a Criminal Complaint based on affidavits filed under penalty of perjury is wrong is typical of nutjob conspiracy theorists like yours ...[text shortened]... There is no "contradiction"; the Criminal Complaint refutes the outdated article you are relying on.

@no1marauder said
I notice you can't read. What do you think "When the door was opened" means?

@no1marauder said
You're quite out of your mind. The Criminal Complaint is quite specific; your reliance on an article retracted weeks ago is insane. Your continued insistence on insisting a news article (that the source admitted was inaccurate) is right and a Criminal Complaint based on affidavits filed under penalty of perjury is wrong is typical of nutjob conspiracy theorists like yours ...[text shortened]... There is no "contradiction"; the Criminal Complaint refutes the outdated article you are relying on.

He was having a little hotel-motel tryst and it got out of hand is the only way to read it.

@jj-adams said
He was having a little hotel-motel tryst and it got out of hand is the only way to read it.

@no1marauder said
Or you can read it like the sworn statements attached to the Criminal Complaint do, including the accused's recorded confession.

@jj-adams said
Paid off to say it, no doubt.
See how easy it is to be like you?

@metal-brain said
You don't want to acknowledge the difference between "when" and "after". You are out of your mind if you think "when" means "after".

https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/paul-pelosi-case-takes-turn-news-outlets-file-court-motion-against-pelosis/?utm_source=papa&utm_medium=twitter

This is a conspiracy of silence. News outlets want to see the evidence.

@no1marauder

LoL

@Zahlanzi
What he said.