28 Apr '21 03:33>
@averagejoe1 saidI don't have a hard time grasping Trump's appeal (although I wouldn't call it a 'concept'😉.
A clarification... I simply said that i was agreeing with Trump’s comment. Yes, the words of Trump. I think that I said I can best answer that by repeating trumps comments, which are quite true in my opinion. Settle, Rover. 😕 As far as caring what people say versus what they accomplish, it is not too difficult to be more interested in what Trump accomplished. Ask Handy ...[text shortened]... nal and so personal, when we are looking at an office not a person.
I hate it for y’all........
The question is why? We're now 8 pages into a thread you've started in which you claim the Dems and Biden are playing a game with illegal immigrants. And yet there's been no pushback to the fact that all of the actions of the prior administration has had a net negative impact on the number of illegal aliens in the US. Earl has pointed to actions that Trump did: the wall, agreements with Mexico, although I would argue that the results are more important than the actions. Mott provided statistics from Obama showing he did a really good job exporting illegals, but stopped short of providing equivalent comparisons to Trump.
Obviously, I know you like Trump and I get his appeal. But I'm just wondering: why do you keep bringing him up in this context? His legacy so far is terrible on immigration. He defunded e-Verify. The internal deportation rate plummeted. There were numerous surges at the border. I don't get it. Is it just the words or are there any numbers you can point to that represent a significant success of his presidency on immigration?
As far as Biden goes, the jury is still out.