@averagejoe1 said
Is it OK if we do? The posts of liberals on the RHP Forum appear to not think so. What is their underlying theme of posts?

It would be weird if it were the same dream, eh?

@wajoma said
You do realise, shag doody for brains, that there are people on this message board that think wandering around the Capitol taking selfies and putting their feet on pelosis desk is an insurrection.

Sometimes you pretend to have some objective reasoning, but even over the ocean afar the cultism shines through. Good on ya.

@mott-the-hoople said
😂. its all you know isn’t it?

The show must go on.

@averagejoe1 said
14,000 of 36,000 students at COLUMBIA are On Foreign Visas. And know that this is not about the Jews. The Jews are but a vehicle for bigger fish to fry. Soros is not about the Jews.
Would you rather have Trump handle our futures, or Biden handle our futures.
36k. Of which 14k are smelly foreigners. I think I will go take a bath. I do not understand. (Just giving Suepersonguy an opening to say ‘right, you don’t understand.)
Does anyone understand?

Capitalism baby.

Columbia costs $346,000 in tuition.

@averagejoe1 said
Can’t vote for a zombie who has policies that are created by youngsters who scramble around inside the White House like little mice. Would trump allow some 26-year-old to walk up to a lectern and pull him away?

Yes, yes he would.

@mott-the-hoople said
you are doing that, and you are lying about it 😉

😲

Look at you doing the Lord's work. Takes courage.

For the record, I support criminal prosecution of any and all corrupt politicians, regardless of party affiliation. From what I remember we spent a lot of time and money on the laptop and there was plenty of opportunity to prosecute crimes.

It's weird how many people are like "I can't physically understand why anyone would vote for ...."

Trump and Biden are both unelectable. Someone still wins. A race to the bottom.

@mott-the-hoople said
a one sided justice system is not hypocrisy…but your supporting going after one candidate and not the other IS HYPOCRISY!

I am not doing that.

Maybe you're right. Maybe there are inequities in our criminal justice system. Let's work on reforming it.

@cliff-mashburn said
Would it be considering "interfering" if a candidate posted lies about a laptop being fake and claiming it was proven because he had signatures from 50 CIA/FBI agents saying so, even though he KNEW the laptop was real and belonged to his son?

Does hypocrisy negate the existence of a crime? Like no one is a criminal if both "sides" are equally guilty?

@mott-the-hoople said
you reference a case about cohen, not trump

Cohen went to prison. For this crime.

Definitely a crime.

@mott-the-hoople said
nope, you lie

"The FEC voted 4-1 to close the inquiry after failing to find that Trump or his campaign “knowingly and willfully” violated campaign finance law"

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/552271-fec-drops-investigation-into-trump-hush-money-payments/

Lol you said he didn't break the law.

The FEC actually said they don't want to waste resources.

https://www.axios.com/2021/05/07/fec-drop-trump-hush-money-case

@averagejoe1 said
I am not being obtuse, but you are saying that I do not know what ‘it ‘ is. No one does, not even Bragg. He has not stated what it, the crime, is.
It is true that the question of trying to influence an election has, or hasn’t, been bandied about., but that is not a crime.
The other cases suggest crimes ( the documents in both presidents’ homes), et al, but can we not dig this one case out.? I only question this one case.

You don't know what it means to falsify a business record?

@earl-of-trumps said
Hi. what are you?
---
I'm a Libertarian.
---
And what do Libertarians stand for?
---
We want FREEDOM!
------
... I KEEL you!!! 😠




Rough crowd out there

Not wajoma. He wants justice.

@mott-the-hoople said
"But trump still broke campaign finance law."

No, he didnt. The fed election comm said he didnt.

this is just lib democrats abusing the justice system...and when it is over, you will still be a whining liberals pos

Lol no. Did you read that in the national inquirer?

The fec panel dropped that case for reasons of "prosecutorial discretion"

@shavixmir said
I’m starting to think libertarian is a portmanteau stemming from librarian and retard.

Don’t be shocked: yes, there are very stupid librarians out there!

I think there are many libertarians out there who just havent thought it through. If the cities are privatized and run by warlords, government cannot enforce laws.