Juror: Please show me the crime

@averagejoe1 said
@AverageJoe1
THE crime.

Again, not ALL of alleged crimes of All cases. Obviously not my OP.

@moonbus said
Falsifying financial records. It’s a felony.

EDIT: copy-pasted from Marauder's thread on the case:


<<
NY Penal Law "§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree. A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an int ...[text shortened]... p-20 pp. 13-14

>>


Now, what part of "felony" do you not understand? Two too many syllables?

@wildgrass said
Someone once said "You cannot prosecute crime in the streets without prosecuting crime in the suites."

This trial is extremely boring because we already know all of it. We're the frog in the pot of warming water.

But trump still broke campaign finance law. He used his business for a cover up. He will likely be assessed a fine.

@mott-the-hoople said
"But trump still broke campaign finance law."

No, he didnt. The fed election comm said he didnt.

this is just lib democrats abusing the justice system...and when it is over, you will still be a whining liberals pos

@wildgrass said
It's been stated multiple times on multiple threads. And you can Google.

Are you trying to say that you don't understand why it is a crime, or that you don't think it should be a crime?

@mott-the-hoople said
"But trump still broke campaign finance law."

No, he didnt. The fed election comm said he didnt.

this is just lib democrats abusing the justice system...and when it is over, you will still be a whining liberals pos

@mott-the-hoople said
"But trump still broke campaign finance law."

No, he didnt. The fed election comm said he didnt.

this is just lib democrats abusing the justice system...and when it is over, you will still be a whining liberals pos

@averagejoe1 said
I am not being obtuse, but you are saying that I do not know what ‘it ‘ is. No one does, not even Bragg. He has not stated what it, the crime, is.
It is true that the question of trying to influence an election has, or hasn’t, been bandied about., but that is not a crime.
The other cases suggest crimes ( the documents in both presidents’ homes), et al, but can we not dig this one case out.? I only question this one case.

@averagejoe1 said
I am asking you all for the official position of a clearly stated crime by Bragg.

@spruce112358
He knew that full well, he is not stupid, just way misinformed.

Very interesting that the DOJ simply pursues crime, regardless of someone's politics, isn't it?

The DOJ seems to be completely unbiased. Unlike what some people seem to think.

@kevcvs57 said
They never said that at all, they just didn’t bother prosecuting it, Trump has spent four years lying about the 2020 election because he’s too much of bed wetter to take a rejection and a loss.
He’s literally raging at the electorate and he means to get even with them like a nasty stalky ex boyfriend.
He’s convinced laws aren’t meant for men like him so maybe the law is chucking everything it can at him to prove him wrong.

@wildgrass said
Lol no. Did you read that in the national inquirer?

The fec panel dropped that case for reasons of "prosecutorial discretion"

@mott-the-hoople said
nope, you lie

"The FEC voted 4-1 to close the inquiry after failing to find that Trump or his campaign “knowingly and willfully” violated campaign finance law"

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/552271-fec-drops-investigation-into-trump-hush-money-payments/

@wildgrass said
Lol you said he didn't break the law.

The FEC actually said they don't want to waste resources.

https://www.axios.com/2021/05/07/fec-drop-trump-hush-money-case