01 Apr 11
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe young lady in question (Dr Francesca Stavrakopoulou) is actually extraordinarily knowledgeable regards scripture, and not the translated stuff either. She is also super hot.
sooo you believe everything you watch on the television if presented by a pretty girl,
meh, who can blame ya!, damnable BBC, they know nothing about scripture, nor the
Bible.
01 Apr 11
Originally posted by avalanchethecatOh really perhaps you can pinpoint the Biblical text she uses to show that Adam was a King
The young lady in question (Dr Francesca Stavrakopoulou) is actually extraordinarily knowledgeable regards scripture, and not the translated stuff either. She is also super hot.
of Jerusalem and that the Garden of Eden was in Jerusalem, for I have studied
scripture almost every day for fifteen years and I have yet to come across it. It
appears to me you have been somewhat swayed by her curves rather than the actual
content of what she was saying.
01 Apr 11
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI expect it's on IPlayer, so you can go watch it if you like. I'll merely say that to my mind she constructs a far more believable scenario than the literal interpretation that you favour. I understand that you are obliged to swallow that whole according to the tenets of your faith, and this, of course, renders you impervious to any other viewpoint, so I don't expect her ideas will find fertile ground with you.
Oh really perhaps you can pinpoint the Biblical text she uses to show that Adam was a King
of Jerusalem and that the Garden of Eden was in Jerusalem, for I have studied
scripture almost every day for fifteen years and I have yet to come across it. It
appears to me you have been somewhat swayed by her curves rather than the actual
content of what she was saying.
01 Apr 11
2 edits
Originally posted by avalanchethecatSo you have proffered nothing, well well, how intwesting, I say to you avalanche the
I expect it's on IPlayer, so you can go watch it if you like. I'll merely say that to my mind she constructs a far more believable scenario than the literal interpretation that you favour. I understand that you are obliged to swallow that whole according to the tenets of your faith, and this, of course, renders you impervious to any other viewpoint, so I don't expect her ideas will find fertile ground with you.
putty cat, that if you put a pretty girl on TV with letters after her name, you could be
made to believe almost anything. What is known about the garden of Eden is written
in scripture, not in the speculative claims of some rationalising secularist BBC
documentary. No matter how pretty the lady is.
01 Apr 11
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat is known about the garden of Eden is written in scripture
So you have proffered nothing, well well, how intwesting, I say to you avalanche the
putty cat, that if you put a pretty girl on TV with letters after her name, you could be
made to believe almost anything. What is known about the garden of Eden is written
in scripture, not in the speculative claims of some rationalising secularist BBC
documentary. No matter how pretty the lady is.
What is known about Middle Earth is written in The lord of The Rings (and it says nothing about any Garden of Eden).
01 Apr 11
2 edits
Originally posted by Agergshouldn't you be instead fantasising about Carol Voderman teaching you number
[b]What is known about the garden of Eden is written in scripture
What is known about Middle Earth is written in The lord of The Rings (and it says nothing about any Garden of Eden).[/b]
theory or some other branch of mathematics? Who cares what it says, it has been
proven to be a work of fantasy, no real people, no real places, no real events.
01 Apr 11
2 edits
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIf she can teach me someting about Daubechies wavelets I'd be very grateful...until that happens I'll content myself with spreading the Truth :]
shouldn't you be instead fantasising about Carol Voderman teaching you number
theory or some other branch of mathematics? who cares what it says, it has been
proven to be a work of fantasy, no real people, no real places, no real events.
Exactly how has it been "proven" to be a work of fantasy Robbie???...this should be interesting...
01 Apr 11
1 edit
Originally posted by AgergDaubechies wavelets? if you teach me about 3d fractal generation, i would be grateful, what does this mean?
If she can teach me someting about Daubechies wavelets I'd be very grateful...until that happens I'll content myself with spreading the Truth :]
Exactly how has it been "proven" to be a work of fantasy Robbie...this should be interesting...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandelbulb
your work has been proven to contain no real people, events or places.
01 Apr 11
3 edits
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI haven't really studied the Mandlebrot set so I'd be in a poor position to explain anything on this matter.
Daubechies wavelets? if you teach me about 3d fractal generation, i would be grateful, what does this mean?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandelbulb
your work has been proven to contain no real people, events or places.
In what way has it been "proven"? in detail please. You *thinking* it's fantasy is no substitute for a rigorous logical proof that it *is* fantasy.