I think uniqueness is actually quite prevalent and easy to produce. Take for example a random list like:
Hedgehog
Cream cheese
Cactus
David Beckham
Here we have an almost certainly unique list that has never been compiled before in the history of mankind. - There is nothing unique about uniqueness.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke I think uniqueness is actually quite prevalent and easy to produce. Take for example a random list like:
Hedgehog
Cream cheese
Cactus
David Beckham
Here we have an almost certainly unique list that has never been compiled before in the history of mankind. - There is nothing unique about uniqueness.
There is nothing unique about uniqueness.
Do you also believe there is nothing good about goodness and nothing moral about morality?
Originally posted by @divegeester If I happened to know what those 10 songs were, would that mean that I owned a tiny part of you?
Not "owned", no. But that tiny bit of information would mean you knew a tiny bit about who I was, albeit not in much depth without all the associations and memories and emotions connected with those 10 songs. That, writ large, is why married couples know each other's unique 'personhood' maybe more than people in any other relationship.
Originally posted by @fmf Not "owned", no. But that tiny bit of information would mean you knew a tiny bit about who I was, albeit not in much depth without all the associations and memories and emotions connected with those 10 songs. That, writ large, is why married couples know each other's unique 'personhood' maybe more than people in any other relationship.
Given that ten Who songs ≈ “a tiny bit” of sigma ( ∑ ) FMF,
and assuming that all “tiny bits” are each ≈ to each other...
We could find that ( ∑ FMF / “tiny bit” ) ≈ ? “Tiny bits”
Therefore if I had you in “bits”, how many would there be?