- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Excuse me posters (especially Ghost, Divegeester, and FMF)
I get the general idea that this thread has nothing particularly of interest to me. Yet some heated or barbed bantor is pretty active here. Of that I get a general impression.
Now if someone gets banned because of what was written by someone on this thread, PLEASE do not insist that I just HAVE to know all about it.
I don't. I am not going to spend much time on this largely (to my sense) frivolous back and forth about "Dive's Bible".
@sonship saidThis thread should be of interest to you sonship, because it's about how Christians interpret the bible to fit their own views.
Excuse me posters (especially Ghost, Divegeester, and FMF)
I get the general idea that this thread has nothing particularly of interest to me. Yet some heated or barbed bantor is pretty active here, Of that I get a general impression.
Now if someone gets banned because of what was written by someone on this thread, PLEASE do not insist that I just HAVE to know ab ...[text shortened]... oing to spend much time on this largely (to my sense) frivolous back and forth about "Dive's Bible".
You and Dive are both Christians, yet disagree terribly about hell, and the trinity.
Why is that?
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
This thread should be of interest to you sonship, because it's about how Christians interpret the bible to fit their own views.
Nothing much is going on here that I find particularly useful to FOLLOW every post.
If somebody gets banned for some remark here, please do not insist that it is impossible for me to NOT HAVE KNOWN all about it.
@sonship saidThe issue is not whether you knew about - or didn't know about - Romans1009 being banned. The issue is about you claiming you knew absolutely nothing about 9 months of creepy trolling alongside Bible copy pastes [hence the "Piss Christ" comparison] by someone touted by Philokalia as the best poster on this forum ~ thousands and thousands of posts, hundreds of threads, many dozens of posts day in day out, night and day... and you then claimed to be completely unaware of all this.
Now if someone gets banned because of what was written by someone on this thread, PLEASE do not insist that I just HAVE to know about it.
It's similar to your supposed oblivion about Eladar. When he was oozing his toxic ministry across almost all threads, calling people ~ most pointedly fellow Christians ~ "children of Satan" day in day out, multiple times per day, sometimes in 2-3 posts in a row, all kinds of threads, for months, dozens and dozens of times, including threads you were active on, sonship, but when you were asked about it [in the context of your claim that all Christians are becoming more like Jesus Christ every day] you insisted that you were completely "unaware of the incident" [sic].
@sonship saidWell, Dive has asked you plenty of times if his salvation is at risk if he rejects the trinity.
@chaney3
This thread should be of interest to you sonship, because it's about how Christians interpret the bible to fit their own views.
Nothing much is going on here that I find particularly useful to FOLLOW every post.
If somebody gets banned for some remark here, please do not insist that it is impossible for me to NOT HAVE KNOWN all about it.
I am interested in your reply.
Not all Christians believe in the trinity.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
This thread should be of interest to you sonship, because it's about how Christians interpret the bible to fit their own views.
You and Dive are both Christians, yet disagree terribly about hell, and the trinity.
Why is that?
Chaney, see if possibly you can grasp this.
Dive and I have been here for years. Just maybe I don't want to have the same argument with him every week, every month, year after year at every time our differences are apparent.
Maybe I don't want to go over the same points with the same poster ad infinitum knowing that we're each convinced of our own differing convictions about something.
09 Nov 18
@sonship saidWhy not instead try to answer chaney3’s question to you?
@chaney3
This thread should be of interest to you sonship, because it's about how Christians interpret the bible to fit their own views.
You and Dive are both Christians, yet disagree terribly about hell, and the trinity.
Why is that?
Chaney, see if possibly you can grasp this.
Dive and I have been here for years. Just maybe I don't want to h ...[text shortened]... er ad infinitum knowing that we're each convinced of our own differing convictions about something.
@chaney3 saidYou won’t get one chaney3, what you have to ask yourself (and him) is WHY you won’t get a straight answer from sonship on this matter.
Well, Dive has asked you plenty of times if his salvation is at risk if he rejects the trinity.
I am interested in your reply.
Sonship has also avoided responding to me picking up on him using the scripture “let your yes be yes and your no be no”. This is very interesting because getting a yes or no answer from sonship is virtually impossible.
Why do you think sonship won’t give a yes or no answer to your question? Here is the answer: He cannot , it’s a “checkmate” question for him.
- If he says YES, dive will lose his salvation, he knows he cannot support the claim scripturally.
- if he says NO dive will not lose his salvation, he knows that everyone will ask him why then is trinity as important as he makes out.
What does this tell you about sonship and his posting here?
09 Nov 18
@fmf saidChaney3 if you are interested in understanding sonship’s persona here, then you should read this insight by FMF too.
The issue is not whether you knew about - or didn't know about - Romans1009 being banned. The issue is about you claiming you knew absolutely nothing about 9 months of creepy trolling alongside Bible copy pastes [hence the "Piss Christ" comparison] by someone touted by Philokalia as the best poster on this forum ~ thousands and thousands of posts, hundreds of threads, many dozens ...[text shortened]... like Jesus Christ every day] you insisted that you were completely "unaware of the incident" [sic].
It’s these principles and interpersonal dynamics that make this forum interesting.
@sonship saidYour dishonesty in this matter is revealing.
@chaney3
This thread should be of interest to you sonship, because it's about how Christians interpret the bible to fit their own views.
Nothing much is going on here that I find particularly useful to FOLLOW every post.
If somebody gets banned for some remark here, please do not insist that it is impossible for me to NOT HAVE KNOWN all about it.
@divegeester saidI wonder if I did a search on your name and the words dishonesty, dishonest, liar,
Your dishonesty in this matter is revealing.
and words of that nature how many different people and times you have accused
people would come up?
@chaney3 saidIn Romans 10:9 Paul says that in order to become a Christian one must declare that Jesus is Lord.
Well, Dive has asked you plenty of times if his salvation is at risk if he rejects the trinity.
I am interested in your reply.
Not all Christians believe in the trinity.
This has several implications. He is asking that Jesus be declared equal to the Lord and he is, in turn, the Lord of your life.
Now as for sitting in judgment those that have a problem with this teaching, it is not our job to judge, rather, just to dispense the truth.