Originally posted by DoctorScribblesShe didn't deserve it, but she had to have one for some reason having to do with the transmission of original sin. She was just as worthless as the rest of us except that she was to become a handy, dandy carrying case for foetus Jesus.
What did Mary do to deserve her immaculate conception?
I don't see what dessert has to do with it anyway. We don't deserve grave via baptism either, but God allows us to receive it that way.
Originally posted by no1marauderAnd, if I am to understand LH, she gave consent for this exploitation prior to even existing.
She didn't deserve it, but she had to have one for some reason having to do with the transmission of original sin. She was just as worthless as the rest of us except that she was to become a handy, dandy carrying case for foetus Jesus.
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesMary gave her assent at the Annunciation.
What did Mary do to deserve her immaculate conception?
I don't see what dessert has to do with it anyway. We don't deserve grave via baptism either, but God allows us to receive it that way.
(You need to check your keypad)
Why do you say we don't deserve grace via baptism? From God's perspective, nothing is done without considerations of Justice being satisfied.
Originally posted by no1marauderPartly right - but she wasn't just the "carrying case" for Jesus, she gave him flesh and blood.
She didn't deserve it, but she had to have one for some reason having to do with the transmission of original sin. She was just as worthless as the rest of us except that she was to become a handy, dandy carrying case for foetus Jesus.
Originally posted by lucifershammerWhat consideration of justice is there in that infant A gets baptized and is now freed from original sin and identical twin infant B doesn't and is still under original sin? The whole thing is rather absurd and arbitrary; certainly no way for an all-powerful deity to arrange things.
Mary gave her assent at the Annunciation.
(You need to check your keypad)
Why do you say we don't deserve grace via baptism? From God's perspective, nothing is done without considerations of Justice being satisfied.
Originally posted by lucifershammerThen you must conclude that there is no free will, and that we merely suffer it as an illusion. You must conclude that we actually make no choices, because we have no alternatives. It is logically impossible for us to not do what God knows we will do, and what is logically impossible does not constitute an alternative.
From God's perspective, there is no "prior".
Originally posted by no1marauderI'd say you're in no position to judge how an all-knowing, all-powerful deity can or should arrange things.
What consideration of justice is there in that infant A gets baptized and is now freed from original sin and identical twin infant B doesn't and is still under original sin? The whole thing is rather absurd and arbitrary; certainly no way for an all-powerful deity to arrange things.