13 Mar '19 20:20>
@ghost-of-a-duke saidSo, instead of one 'Big Bang', you believe in the 'Big Bounce'?
No. I believe the universe has always existed, in one form or another.
No need for your sky God.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bounce
@ghost-of-a-duke saidSo, instead of one 'Big Bang', you believe in the 'Big Bounce'?
No. I believe the universe has always existed, in one form or another.
No need for your sky God.
@darfius said'The Universe' is a collective noun for everything that exists. It is correct to speak of it in this way. It's like speaking of 'my stuff' as shorthand for 'everything I own'. Common usage, you know?
You speak of 'the universe' as if it is a single entity rather than our label for the sum totality of objects which exist. Which of these objects do you propose has existed "in one form or another?" Because we as yet are not aware of an eternal object. Or even that such an object is possible.
@suzianne saidThe point I am making is that colloquialisms sometimes "sneak" assumptions past critical examination. Nothing in the universe is "eternal", so why would adding up a bunch of nothings add up to something?
'The Universe' is a collective noun for everything that exists. It is correct to speak of it in this way. It's like speaking of 'my stuff' as shorthand for 'everything I own'. Common usage, you know?
@darfius saidThe universe 'is' a single entity.
You speak of 'the universe' as if it is a single entity rather than our label for the sum totality of objects which exist. Which of these objects do you propose has existed "in one form or another?" Because we as yet are not aware of an eternal object. Or even that such an object is possible.
@suzianne saidBig bang, big crunch, big bang, big crunch, big bang.... (You get the picture).
So, instead of one 'Big Bang', you believe in the 'Big Bounce'?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bounce
@darfius saidIf the universe itself is eternal, and everything is part of this one universe, then 'everything' is in fact eternal.
The point I am making is that colloquialisms sometimes "sneak" assumptions past critical examination. Nothing in the universe is "eternal", so why would adding up a bunch of nothings add up to something?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThere you go again trying to pass colloquialisms off as scientific precision. The universe is not a single entity. It is the collection of entities.
The universe 'is' a single entity.
Is God a single entity?
I'm Christian. I used to debate here back in the day. Thought I'd check out the old stomping grounds.
@darfius saidKindly evidence. (Remembering the Bible is a purely human written document, so please do not try to pass it off as something with any clout).
There you go again trying to pass colloquialisms off as scientific precision. The universe is not a single entity. It is the collection of entities.
God is not a single entity, but the entity known as the Father is eternal and for all eternity He has "begotten" the Son.
@sonship saidHis join date was 22 Dec '04 so it is a logical assumption he is using the 'same' identity.
@Darfius
I'm Christian. I used to debate here back in the day. Thought I'd check out the old stomping grounds.
Do you prefer to keep your past identity your own business?
If you do, I believe that is perfectly your right to do so.
But there is one poster who I wonder if you are him.
Maybe I'll PM you.
Maybe I'll just watch along.
Welcome either way.
@sonship saidThank you. My handle since 2004 has always been Darfius.
@Darfius
I'm Christian. I used to debate here back in the day. Thought I'd check out the old stomping grounds.
Do you prefer to keep your past identity your own business?
If you do, I believe that is perfectly your right to do so.
But there is one poster who I wonder if you are him.
Maybe I'll PM you.
Maybe I'll just watch along.
Welcome either way.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhat would you like evidence for? And have you given up the claim that the fictitious entity known as "the universe" is eternal?
Kindly evidence. (Remembering the Bible is a purely human written document, so please do not try to pass it off as something with any clout).
@darfius saidYou have stated that 'the entity known as the Father is eternal and for all eternity He has "begotten" the Son.'
What would you like evidence for? And have you given up the claim that the fictitious entity known as "the universe" is eternal?
Kindly evidence. (Remembering the Bible is a purely human written document, so please do not try to pass it off as something with any clout).
@sonship saidSorry sonship, did I miss your retraction for the erroneous statement that I believed the universe created itself out of nothing (despite telling you numerous times I believe in an eternal universe that had no creation event? ).
@Ghost-of-a-DukeKindly evidence. (Remembering the Bible is a purely human written document, so please do not try to pass it off as something with any clout).
If that is a starting point then I would not "remember" that.
I'd be willing to "remember" that that is YOUR erroneous belief.
I believe the Bible is a product of God communicating with h ...[text shortened]... lt of God speaking to humankind through human writers under inspiration, moved by the Spirit of God?