02 Jun 06
Originally posted by CreepySlashOkay, firstly you have not provided any evidence, merely a question. Secondly, you immediately offer unsupported faith as evidence for creationism.
How is the earth millions of years old?It is just an assumption and evolution bases itself on this assumption.So all evolution could be very easily wrong.
Creation is based on faith in God and His Word(the Bible).
Try again.
02 Jun 06
Originally posted by CreepySlashGod is an assumption (and one that requires a leap of faith).
How is the earth millions of years old?It is just an assumption and evolution bases itself on this assumption.So all evolution could be very easily wrong.
Creation is based on faith in God and His Word(the Bible).
Evolution is rooted in clear, repeatable, verifiable, material observation.
02 Jun 06
Originally posted by WulebgrTell me of some observations for evolution.My evidence is from the Bible,which yes is plain faith.I think that God is more sensible than any other god or evolution for that matter.How can evolution say that a Big Bang brought about such a complex universe.I mean how can random chemical reactions bring about a humans,who have such a complex structure!
God is an assumption (and one that requires a leap of faith).
Evolution is rooted in clear, repeatable, verifiable, material observation.
02 Jun 06
Originally posted by CreepySlashAhhh…ahem, evolution says nothing about the big bang. Evolution and the big bang are two separate theories that answer completely different questions.
Tell me of some observations for evolution.My evidence is from the Bible,which yes is plain faith.I think that God is more sensible than any other god or evolution for that matter.How can evolution say that a Big Bang brought about such a complex universe.I mean how can random chemical reactions bring about a humans,who have such a complex structure!
Now I have a question. If you do not know the difference between the TOE and the big bang theory why do you think you know enough about either one to make any judgments about their validity at all?
Perhaps it would be more accurate for you to simply state that you are so wedded to creationism that you have chosen not to investigate any other possible explanations. Heck, this tactic might even win you some bonus points with your god! 😉
TheSkipper