30 Apr 14
Originally posted by SwissGambitFirst of all the Book of Genesis was supposedly written by Moses, in the year 1491 to 1451 BC according to tradition. Was Moses there I doubt it but that is a separate issue. If you will open up the book of Genesis which I'm sure you probably have setting beside you some where. Look up Genesis chapter 2 verce 7 and read the part about the Garden of Eden. In case you don't I will quote it from the Living Bible so it might be more understandable. "Then time came when the Lord God formed an man's body from the dust and breathed into it the breath of life. And man became a living person. Then the lord God planted a garden in Eden And placed the man into the garden." For the sake of time and space you can read the rest at will but I pick back up at verse 20 So the Lord God formed from the soil every kind of animal and bird and brought them to the man to see what he would call them." So God wasn't through creating. And I believe the evidence is still there to suggest he is still creating today as we speak.
Hmm. So, how do you reconcile your view on apes vs. man with Gen 1, which says that man was the the last thing God created?
Edit: Oh, I see. Not up for debate. Just ignore this post. Just another skeptic being difficult.
How's the weather where you live?
- Joined
- 26 Feb 14
- Moves
- 1339
30 Apr 14
Originally posted by cashthetrashmy god can take your god tutu or not
First of all the Book of Genesis was supposedly written by Moses, in the year 1491 to 1451 BC according to tradition. Was Moses there I doubt it but that is a separate issue. If you will open up the book of Genesis which I'm sure you probably have setting beside you some where. Look up Genesis chapter 2 verce 7 and read the part about the Garden of Eden ...[text shortened]... ng. And I believe the evidence is still there to suggest he is still creating today as we speak.
30 Apr 14
1 edit
Originally posted by cashthetrashBut isn't that a different order of creation than Genesis 1? Gen 1 specifically states that the beasts and animals were made before man. Apes don't count as beasts or animals?
First of all the Book of Genesis was supposedly written by Moses, in the year 1491 to 1451 BC according to tradition. Was Moses there I doubt it but that is a separate issue. If you will open up the book of Genesis which I'm sure you probably have setting beside you some where. Look up Genesis chapter 2 verce 7 and read the part about the Garden of Eden ...[text shortened]... ng. And I believe the evidence is still there to suggest he is still creating today as we speak.
01 May 14
Originally posted by SwissGambitThat was the end of week one but there are many other weeks. New animals have been discovered since. There is no conclusive evidence that all animals were created before man. Show me where in Genesis 1 where it says all animals were created and specifically monkeys were made before man. Genesis 2 says otherwise. But the point is man has and always have had dominion over apes not the other way around. In the meantime go get a clue in your science forum and leave christians to fellowship with their own species. All you ape lovers don't have it together yet. There might be a scientist in a chess forum somewhere that can prove you to be the ape you want to be or why your not. By the way I mean that in jest but take it as you want. 🙂 If the banana fits stuff it.
But isn't that a different order of creation than Genesis 1? Gen 1 specifically states that the beasts and animals were made before man. Apes don't count as beasts or animals?
01 May 14
Originally posted by cashthetrashThread 157451
In the meantime go get a clue in your science forum and leave christians to fellowship with their own species.
Welcome to Spirituality.
01 May 14
Originally posted by ZahlanziOriginally posted by Zahlanzi
assuming you are talking about natural laws of physics, genetics, etc, yes, science discovers knowledge, it doesn't invent stuff.
assuming you are talking about natural laws of physics, genetics, etc, yes, science discovers knowledge, it doesn't invent stuff.
yes, sir. and who would you suppose is responsible for the presence of the "natural laws of physics, genetics"?
01 May 14
Originally posted by FMFScience and atheism are not considered a spiritual matter. Christianity and many other religions are however considered spiritual. There are many competent scientist that would argue against atheism. You should go there and argue with them. So if I were to argue for a forum, which I won't. It would be an athiest non believer forum. But without Christians you would have nothing to talk about and would bore yourselves to death so the forum would ultimately fail. Your dependant on Christianity for your your voice to be heard. Christians on the other hand will survive without you and in spite of you. We have eternity on our side. Every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord. Even you.
Why don't you lobby the web site owners to create a Christians Only forum? This is a Spirituality Forum.
01 May 14
Originally posted by cashthetrashThis forum would fizzle out and die a death without the non-Christians here.
So if I were to argue for a forum, which I won't. It would be an athiest non believer forum. But without Christians you would have nothing to talk about and would bore yourselves to death so the forum would ultimately fail. Your dependant on Christianity for your your voice to be heard. Christians on the other hand will survive without you and in spite of you.
