04 Aug '17 14:35>
Originally posted by @whodeyQuotes, please.
Darwin actually thought of black people as inferior to whites.
In his mind, they were between an ape and a human being.
Originally posted by @whodeyQuotes, please.
Darwin actually thought of black people as inferior to whites.
In his mind, they were between an ape and a human being.
Originally posted by @chaney3Quotes, please. Where/when did Darwin say this?
Go to the zoo.
Look at a monkey.
That monkey should be a human according to Darwin.
Originally posted by @wildgrassWe know the answer; he didn't.. I just hate it when stupid people idiotically make up total rubbish like that.
Where/when did Darwin say this?
Originally posted by @wildgrassUnlike a typical whodey claim, this one appears to hold some grain of truth:
Quotes, please.
The great break in the organic chain between man and his nearest allies, which cannot be bridged over by any extinct or living species, has often been advanced as a grave objection to the belief that man is descended from some lower form; but this objection will not appear of much weight to those who, convinced by general reasons, believe in the general principle of evolution. Breaks incessantly occur in all parts of the series, some being wide, sharp and defined, others less so in various degrees; as between the orang and its nearest allies—between the Tarsius and the other Lemuridæ—between the elephant and in a more striking manner between the Ornithorhynchus or Echidna, and other mammals. But all these breaks depend merely on the number of related forms which have become extinct. At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraThanks for the quote!
Unlike a typical whodey claim, this one appears to hold some grain of truth:
[quote]The great break in the organic chain between man and his nearest allies, which cannot be bridged over by any extinct or living species, has often been advanced as a grave objection to the belief that man is descended from some lower form; but this objection will not ...[text shortened]... of man are in fact highly similar and show less genetic diversity than is found in e.g. chimps.
Originally posted by @fabianfnasI am just illustrating their logic.
Careful... careful...
Originally posted by @eladarThere are many lines of direct evidence for evolution:
According to the Bible, slavery is acceptable.
As to the question of evolution. ..
Is it reproducible? Has anyone actually seen it happen? I mean maco version of course.
Can evolution explain life without abiogenesis?
Originally posted by @chaney3Why?
No apes, chimps or orangutan should exist today.
They should all be human.
Originally posted by @chaney3Nope.
What does evolve mean?
Apes evolved into human. Right?
Yet...apes still exist.
Evolution is wrong.
Originally posted by @chaney3Let me simplify this for you:
If humans evolved from apes, as absurd as that theory is, then NO apes should exist today. They should all be human.
Evolution is absurd
Originally posted by @metal-brainWe have already told him this.
Let me simplify this for you:
All apes and humans evolved from a common ancestor that is now extinct.
Originally posted by @chaney3If you were born from your parents, your brothers and sisters should not exist.
If humans evolved from apes, as absurd as that theory is, then NO apes should exist today. They should all be human.
Evolution is absurd
Originally posted by @chaney3Apparently this silly troll bait has to be dragged out every now and then.
If humans evolved from apes, as absurd as that theory is, then NO apes should exist today. They should all be human.
Evolution is absurd
Originally posted by @js357Yeah, like Chaney is such an absolute expert on all things evolutionary he can make sweeping statements like, thinking he is 100% correct since his Phd thesis covered this subject and he proved Darwin wrong to his college boards. Amazing, eh. I really want to see that thesis paper.
Apparently this silly troll bait has to be dragged out every now and then.