Originally posted by @chaney3I understand that your claim is that the theory of evolution predicts that "all species of ape should be human by now." Can you explain why you think the theory of evolution predicts this? Merely reiterating your claim does not provide much in the way of helping us understand how you reached this particular conclusion.
Sure.
All species of ape should be human by now.
But this is obviously not the case.
Darwin was wrong.
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraWhat does evolve mean?
I understand that your claim is that the theory of evolution predicts that "all species of ape should be human by now." Can you explain why you think the theory of evolution predicts this? Merely reiterating your claim does not provide much in the way of helping us understand how you reached this particular conclusion.
Apes evolved into human. Right?
Yet...apes still exist.
Evolution is wrong.
Originally posted by @chaney3I hear you. I'm just waiting for you arguments to you claim. Bring it to us and we will tell you that you don't know anything about evolution.
No apes or monkeys should exist right now. They should all be human BY NOW.
Evolution is wrong.
You don't know anything about evolution!
There are some fundamentalistic christians who think that evolution and BigBang-theory are is the same thing. There are some fundamentalistic christians who think evolution should explain how life started. There are some fundamentalistic christians who think that giraffes cannot exist because when they didn't had long necks they would starve because they couldn't reach the treetops.
There are so many christians that demonstrate their ignorance about evolution, yet has so strong feelings about evolution. Lalala, don't want to learn anything, lalala...
Originally posted by @fabianfnasGo to the zoo.
I hear you. I'm just waiting for you arguments to you claim. Bring it to us and we will tell you that you don't know anything about evolution.
You don't know anything about evolution!
There are some fundamentalistic christians who think that evolution and BigBang-theory are is the same thing. There are some fundamentalistic christians who think evo ...[text shortened]... ion, yet has so strong feelings about evolution. Lalala, don't want to learn anything, lalala...
Look at a monkey.
That monkey should be a human according to Darwin.
Originally posted by @chaney3You still demonstrate your ignorance about evolution.
Go to the zoo.
Look at a monkey.
That monkey should be a human according to Darwin.
Do you really have to be ignorant and know nothing in order to call yourself a good christian?
Originally posted by @fabianfnasYou have not offered a reason why I am wrong. Why?
You still demonstrate your ignorance about evolution.
Do you really have to be ignorant and know nothing in order to call yourself a good christian?
Because I'm right.
Originally posted by @chaney3Didn't you read my answer? Go back again and read it. Then come back and try again.
You have not offered a reason why I am wrong. Why?
Because I'm right.
You lost another thread recently here at science. Now you are eager to lose another?
Originally posted by @chaney3Yes, I think we've established that you believe that the theory of evolution implies that apes should no longer exist. What I am trying to ascertain is why you think this is the case. Could you explain?
What does evolve mean?
Apes evolved into human. Right?
Yet...apes still exist.
Evolution is wrong.
The fundamental pillars of the modern theory of evolution are reproduction (of DNA), expression of DNA in the phenotype, interaction of the phenotype with the environment, and the possibility of mutations in DNA. Can you elaborate as to how, starting from these principles, it follows that apes should not or no longer exist?
1 edit
Originally posted by @whodeyAt those times almost every christian thought that. Many christians still believe it today.
Darwin actually thought of black people as inferior to whites.
Btw - do you think chaney3 is ignorant about evolution?
Originally posted by @fabianfnasHe does not seem to be aware of how evolution explains away the dilemma he brings up, so yea.
At those times almost every christian thought that. Many christians still believe it today.
Btw - do you think chaney3 is ignorant about evolution?
In the end, you either accept the hypothesis or you reject it.
So you seem to imply that Darwin simply accepted the Christian racism against black?
Hysterical. Like is or not, eugenics was a booming field during his time, along with its racism in the scientific community. This then led to Hitler
Originally posted by @whodeyI don't know much about the theological life of Darwin. I just don't know. To pretend otherwise would be unwise.
He does not seem to be aware of how evolution explains away the dilemma he brings up, so yea.
In the end, you either accept the hypothesis or you reject it.
So you seem to imply that Darwin simply accepted the Christian racism against black?
Hysterical. Like is or not, eugenics was a booming field during his time, along with its racism in the scientific community. This then led to Hitler
But christians in US still thought, during the life of Darwin, that slavery was accepted and was supported by the bible. This has nothing to do with evolution as what we know it to be today.
For me to discuss Darwins thoughts about racism would be off-topic in this thread, as it is not about, neither apes nor evolution.
Originally posted by @sonhouseCareful... careful...
So in other words, Darwin is racist, therefore evolution is false.
Originally posted by @fabianfnasAccording to the Bible, slavery is acceptable.
I don't know much about the theological life of Darwin. I just don't know. To pretend otherwise would be unwise.
But christians in US still thought, during the life of Darwin, that slavery was accepted and was supported by the bible. This has nothing to do with evolution as what we know it to be today.
For me to discuss Darwins thoughts about racism would be off-topic in this thread, as it is not about, neither apes nor evolution.
As to the question of evolution. ..
Is it reproducible? Has anyone actually seen it happen? I mean maco version of course.
Can evolution explain life without abiogenesis?