1. Subscribermoonbus
    Über-Nerd
    Joined
    31 May '12
    Moves
    8221
    05 Feb '23 11:52
    “Men are numerous, Socrates is a man, therefore Socrates is numerous.” [Strebbing]

    Discuss.
  2. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    05 Feb '23 20:52
    @moonbus said
    “Men are numerous, Socrates is a man, therefore Socrates is numerous.” [Strebbing]

    Discuss.
    Man != Men
  3. Subscribermoonbus
    Über-Nerd
    Joined
    31 May '12
    Moves
    8221
    06 Feb '23 08:352 edits
    @bigdogg said
    Man != Men
    Distinguish from “Men are mortal, Socrates is a man, therefore Socrates is mortal.”

    One argument is valid, the other not. Your answer is on the right track, but not complete.
  4. Joined
    08 Dec '06
    Moves
    28383
    06 Feb '23 12:53
    Numerousness is a higher-order property. "Men are numerous" means "the set of men has many members." You're describing the set and not the members of the set so you can't infer that a man is numerous.

    From de Swart's Philosophical and Mathematical Logic:
    "It is interesting to note that the notions of ‘finite’ and of ‘non-enumerable’, which
    are not first-order properties, can be formulated in second-order logic. In second-order logic, one is allowed to quantify not only over individual
    variables, but also over function variables and predicate variables."

    From the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's article on properties:
    "Properties are those entities that can be predicated of things or, in other words, attributed to them. Thus, properties are often called predicables."
    "This duplicity grounds the common distinction between different orders or types of properties: first-order ones are properties of things that are not themselves predicables; second-order ones are properties of first-order properties; and so on. Even though the formal and ontological issues behind this terminology are controversial, it is widely used and is often connected to the subdivision between first-order and higher-order logics"
  5. Subscribermoonbus
    Über-Nerd
    Joined
    31 May '12
    Moves
    8221
    06 Feb '23 21:411 edit
    @damionhonegan

    Well done!

    Set theory for beginners:

    In the set “men are mortal”, the mortality applies to each member of the set, and therefore also to Socrates. Hence, a valid inference.

    Whereas, in the set “men are numerous”, the numerosity applies to the set, and therefore not to Socrates. Hence, a fallacious inference.
  6. Joined
    23 Feb '22
    Moves
    1798
    03 Mar '23 17:22
    Didn't anyone here take a Logic 101 course in college?
    Syllogisms are easy to solve.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree