Only Chess
01 Sep 11
Originally posted by tharkeshThere used to be a player who used to post positions, Korch, he is a big friend of GP,
this actually is fun. can't you start a second blog or the "weekly position guessing thread"? and at some point you show 'the' conclusion, which all of us then will happily agree 😉
anyhow he used to post positions and all he would say was, evaluate the position.
Everyone used to contribute their ideas, it was like you say, really fun and an excellent
way to learn.
Originally posted by morgskioh no, the idea was to ignore loud people and get focussed on a game of chess instead.... you see, now you woke him up again....he is all screaming again...
a) This fella(/lass 😉) really likes to dish it out but seems to have a sense of humour failure when he's on the receiving end
and i still am looking forward to more position ideas and at some point a 'solution'... 🙂
Originally posted by tharkeshHave posted a positional ideas in a new thread, not the most taxing of problems but then again I'm not a very clever chess player...
oh no, the idea was to ignore loud people and get focussed on a game of chess instead.... you see, now you woke him up again....he is all screaming again...
and i still am looking forward to more position ideas and at some point a 'solution'... 🙂
The post that was quoted here has been removedI don't think you can be slandered/libelled/defamed if you are hiding behind a fictitious name and are accused of having hidden behind another fictitious name in the past. The test is whether or not your good reputation has been damaged in some way. In this case, that cannot happen since nobody can make a connection between the fictitious name kopatov and the real person hiding behind the name kopatov. This would also apply to being mistaken for a board game. Did I mention you look a little Scrabble today?
Originally posted by DiophantusLet us start with some cold hard facts and proof.
I don't think you can be slandered/libelled/defamed if you are hiding behind a fictitious name and are accused of having hidden behind another fictitious name in the past. The test is whether or not your good reputation has been damaged in some way. In this case, that cannot happen since nobody can make a connection between the fictitious name kopatov and ...[text shortened]... also apply to being mistaken for a board game. Did I mention you look a little Scrabble today?
1. PROVE THAT KOPATOV IS NOT MY REAL NAME AND THAT I AM THIS CLUDI PERSON. Start by showing us some ID's, IP addresses, emails we need much more that your hot air. YOU HAVE TILL MIDNIGHT TO PRESENT THE COLD HARD FACTS.
2. PROVE THAT I AM THIS WIFE-BEATER PERSON AS ALLEGED BY SKEETER. LET US SEE POLICE RECORDS, COURT DOCUMENTS, AFFIDAVITS. WE WOULD REQUIRE MORE THAN SOMEONE'S MENTAL HAEMORRHAGING TO BE CLAIMING SOMEONE IS A WIFE-BEATER ON A CHESS FORUM.
Originally posted by kopatovYou need to show first where it was alleged. We all know the post you're referring to.. but I have some bad news. Much as you'd like to be the center of everyone's universe... you're not... you were just an insignificant "and of course" on the end. If you were half as clever as you think you are you'd know who it was aimed at.. and no I'm not going to tell you. You're lawyer is advising you badly. But don't get rid of him.. at this rate you may need his services anyway.
2. PROVE THAT I AM THIS WIFE-BEATER PERSON AS ALLEGED BY SKEETER. LET US SEE POLICE RECORDS, COURT DOCUMENTS, AFFIDAVITS. WE WOULD REQUIRE MORE THAN SOMEONE'S MENTAL HAEMORRHAGING TO BE CLAIMING SOMEONE IS A WIFE-BEATER ON A CHESS FORUM.
16 Sep 11
Originally posted by kopatovi believe you, i believe your name is realy KOPATOS, Not cludi the wife beater, obviously with all that built up rage you have never been with a woman in your sad miserable twisted excuse of a life. have a nice day 🙄🙄
Let us start with some cold hard facts and proof.
1. PROVE THAT KOPATOV IS NOT MY REAL NAME AND THAT I AM THIS CLUDI PERSON. Start by showing us some ID's, IP addresses, emails we need much more that your hot air. YOU HAVE TILL MIDNIGHT TO PRESENT THE COLD HARD FACTS.
2. PROVE THAT I AM THIS WIFE-BEATER PERSON AS ALLEGED BY SKEETER. LET US SEE POLICE REC ...[text shortened]... THAN SOMEONE'S MENTAL HAEMORRHAGING TO BE CLAIMING SOMEONE IS A WIFE-BEATER ON A CHESS FORUM.
Originally posted by kopatov... and if I don't?
Let us start with some cold hard facts and proof.
1. PROVE THAT KOPATOV IS NOT MY REAL NAME AND THAT I AM THIS CLUDI PERSON. Start by showing us some ID's, IP addresses, emails we need much more that your hot air. YOU HAVE TILL MIDNIGHT TO PRESENT THE COLD HARD FACTS.
2. PROVE THAT I AM THIS WIFE-BEATER PERSON AS ALLEGED BY SKEETER. LET US SEE POLICE REC ...[text shortened]... THAN SOMEONE'S MENTAL HAEMORRHAGING TO BE CLAIMING SOMEONE IS A WIFE-BEATER ON A CHESS FORUM.
I suppose you could shout at me some more.