11 Jan 06
Originally posted by rathishOh and then you start more games and more people leave and then you are still stuck so you ask for more games and then more until you effectivly have the same rights as subscribers. Then no one subscribes because it's not worth it, then Russ and Chris go under and RHP ends forever. Nice idea.
Iam not a regular subscriber, so i have a limit of 6 games. people, start loosing and they will then stop playing till the time goes out, forbidding me to play more games..... I think RHP should increase the no of games to 10.
Why don't you just subscribe?
11 Jan 06
1 edit
Originally posted by rathishI think you may well have let yourself in for some flak with this post, here's the clean/polite version:
Iam not a regular subscriber, so i have a limit of 6 games. people, start loosing and they will then stop playing till the time goes out, forbidding me to play more games..... I think RHP should increase the no of games to 10.
Don't you think it's a great site and you get to play 6 games for free, somone is paying for all of this, ultimately us (the subscribers) but the owners of the site took a financial gamble investing in it and probably still carry some risk. Don't you think 6 games is enough for free? it's supposed tro get you interested enough to subscribe, if rhp started increasing the free games why would anyone subscribe?
11 Jan 06
1 edit
Originally posted by rathishSeriously, you have one game where a guy joined on January 2, played moves on that day and the next, sucked and has now apparently left the site. All your other games have moves in the last day. I don't know what the time controls are in the one game, but the skull should be popping up soon if they are normal ones. Stop yer crying.
Iam not a regular subscriber, so i have a limit of 6 games. people, start loosing and they will then stop playing till the time goes out, forbidding me to play more games..... I think RHP should increase the no of games to 10.
11 Jan 06
Originally posted by stevetoddSo, you guys believe that the people who cannot afford to pay should stop playing online chess ????
I think you may well have let yourself in for some flak with this post, here's the clean/polite version:
Don't you think it's a great site and you get to play 6 games for free, somone is paying for all of this, ultimately us (the subscribers) but the owners of the site took a financial gamble investing in it and probably still carry some risk. Don't you t ...[text shortened]... d enough to subscribe, if rhp started increasing the free games why would anyone subscribe?
11 Jan 06
Originally posted by rathishNo, but if you have a problem with the game limits send feedback at the bottom of the page to Russ. It's his choice, not ours.
So, you guys believe that the people who cannot afford to pay should stop playing online chess ????
In the meantime you also have posting rights and have picked up lots of tips and information. And got a lot of feedback from people who are willing to help you with your game. That's not so bad for a freebie.