Impossible challenge

@coquette said
Don't see the relevance, sabotage?

26 anyway a very high value probably reflecting the slow times on the forum...

@Ponderable

25.5

@Ponderable

only 15 this time

@ponderable said
@Ponderable

only 15 this time

Interesting dynamic . . . Still, though, . . .

@coquette

28

@ponderable said
@coquette

28

12

@ponderable said
12

9

@ponderable said
9

It's trending faster . . .hmmmmm????

@coquette said
It's trending faster . . .hmmmmm????

It is varying, now and then people surface, creating comparatively many threads

17 (so slower again)

Under New Management

"We are reviewing the rules of the original post and we feel some changes are in order to reflect public opinion of the oscillator circuit vortex with no possibility of hindering any past future deligates that are under review of the Wilkinson agreement"

Sincerely
Patzering

???

@patzering said
Under New Management

"We are reviewing the rules of the original post and we feel some changes are in order to reflect public opinion of the oscillator circuit vortex with no possibility of hindering any past future deligates that are under review of the Wilkinson agreement"

Sincerely
Patzering

Awaiting a declaration

14.5

@ponderable said
14.5

Suspect that we are reaching criticality sufficient for inferential analytics. Mean. Median, and Modalities; variance, range, coefficient of certainty, seasonal trending, correlates with varances in member viewings and postings and such. We are on the cusp of d8scovery.

18