Originally posted by FMFAh.
The debate on this topic already happened on the thread I gave the link to. People can see how you and your arguments fared there.
And (if your analysis is correct), I lost that debate miserably.
NOW I see why you're so intent to point people that way.
Unfortunately for you, the only thing that was exposed was a complete failure on the part of the six people decrying a flat earth in their ability to defend their belief in a globe.
Take another swing, won't you?
They're nearly free...
1 edit
Originally posted by FreakyKBHTo be fair sir, it is hard to get motivated to provide evidence for the blindingly obvious.
I see you are still avoiding the topic.
Guess it is harder than you thought to prove your beliefs, huh.
Ask me to prove global warming and i'm as alert as a kitten. Ask me to prove cats like to eat fish and i'm going back to bed.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHAnd here I thought that that thread was really all about you just "taking the piss" out of them.
Ah.
And (if your analysis is correct[hidden]at it literally never is[/hidden]), I lost that debate miserably.
NOW I see why you're so intent to point people that way.
Unfortunately for you, the only thing that was exposed was a complete failure on the part of the six people decrying a flat earth in their ability to defend their belief in a globe.
Take another swing, won't you?
They're nearly free...
Was I wrong?
Originally posted by SuzianneCertainly, that element does exist.
And here I thought that that thread was really all about you just "taking the piss" out of them.
Was I wrong?
That being said, how is it that something so 'blindingly obvious,' something so demonstrably true... can also be so impossible to prove or demonstrate objectively?
We've all accepted a globe earth since before any of us were born, but on what basis?
The basis used (once challenged) melts away revealing a ruler without the benefit of any clothing.