General
07 Jul 21
@divegeester saidWho's angry?
You are suggesting that my reposting of your buddy Suzianne’s utterly ludicrous, comedic, pathetic angry claims that I paid Russ to get those user accounts banned…is a breach of the data protection act?
@divegeester saidhttps://www.clear-say.com/protesting-too-much/
No one, least of all me, is asking for Suzianne to be banned, not even reprimanded.
Her post which I referred to, is a bother of her vitriolic angry triggers, stemming from her own twisted sense of injustice, and based on her being completely and utterly wrong about me.
I think she’s an unpleasant but comedic character who can’t be taken seriously and who’s ludicr ...[text shortened]... sation made against myself.
It a pity to see you descend into this partisan behaviour Ponderable.
@fmf saidI've read it. Maybe you should.
Yes. He was talking about your accusation being deleted and about you being banned and how it shouldn't be discussed and how it should be reported etc. Ponderable. Look for yourself.
His entire point was that you and your partner in crime should have handled this in private. But you insist on going public because you and your ally want to use the opportunity to grandstand.
@fmf saidI don't see them "trying to protect" me.
If Suzianne is sticking to her guns on this bribery accusation, why are Ponderable and Ghost of a Duke trying to protect her from her claims being discussed?
This is another tool you use in order to try to coerce cooperation. Guilt by association.
You just can't help yourself, can you?
Go on, keep talking.