Trump’s 2020 campaign strategy ?

@joe-shmo said
pfff....

What a waste! I should have figured you wouldn't want to engage in an honest analysis attempt. I'm not disputing the evidence is not concrete ( I'm not an investigative journalist getting paid to suss out voter fraud ). You said you wanted shown how it would work, I showed you how it would work...

Your reponse...but, but ,but what about bad faith voters in the Pa EC! Do you have evidence of that?

My response didn't say anything about "bad faith voters in the PA EC".

@ghost-of-a-duke said
What are the top 3?

1. Supercharging the economy
2. Rewriting unfair trade deals
3. Building the wall

my opinion

@no1marauder said
My response didn't say anything about "bad faith voters in the PA EC".

EDIT:

Ok, I see that what you are saying is that Pa uses the State Popular vote to award Electoral college votes. So my argument of migration internal to the state is flawed.

The logical move is to the next scale. They must be migrating externally from blue states. "I'm from Philidelphia" is just a cover.

@earl-of-trumps said
1. Supercharging the economy
2. Rewriting unfair trade deals
3. Building the wall

my opinion

The economy is not supercharged and the wall is not built.

@earl-of-trumps said
1. Supercharging the economy
2. Rewriting unfair trade deals
3. Building the wall

my opinion

Hmmm.

1. Supercharging the economy ??
What does that mean ? Another way of overheating the economy ?
You do realize that the economy would be doing ok if Hilary was President. The economy is just an extrapolation of the recovery curve from the Obama administration.
Oh, and btw, Trump has totally squandered away his campaign centrepiece with his pathetic pandemic response.

2. Rewriting unfair trade deals ??
Let’s think about that.
You do realize that America is a country with 4.3% of the world’s population consuming 25% of the world’s natural resources.
Define unfair.

3. Building the wall.
A late night punch line these days.
Hmmm. Seems other countries don’t have to build a wall to keep Americans from entering their country. Including Canada.
Nice job on the COVID-19 response, btw...

@earl-of-trumps said
1. Supercharging the economy
2. Rewriting unfair trade deals
3. Building the wall

my opinion

Is that the wall Mexico was going to pay for?

😲

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Is that the wall Mexico was going to pay for?

😲

Actually, that wall is going to keep Americans out of Mexico.
And America is going to pay for the wall.
They’re all rednecks, trailer park dwellers and Bible thumpers !!
And apparently, there are some good people too. 😛

@mghrn55 You do realize that the economy would be doing ok if Hilary was President.

No I don't know that, neither do you. You are just making it up.

Hillary Clinton NEVER would have cut taxes

@earl-of-trumps said
@mghrn55 You do realize that the economy would be doing ok if Hilary was President.

No I don't know that, neither do you. You are just making it up.

Hillary Clinton NEVER would have cut taxes

That's why her economy would do better than Trump's. Taxes are how the government charges the wealthy for the extensive policing and property enforcement that is done for the benefit of the wealthy. Under Trump, these people are getting a free ride.

And of course she wouldn't have screwed up the response to COVID. Under Hillary COVID would not have flourished like it has under Trump.

@mghrn55 said
Hmmm.

1. Supercharging the economy ??
What does that mean ? Another way of overheating the economy ?
You do realize that the economy would be doing ok if Hilary was President. The economy is just an extrapolation of the recovery curve from the Obama administration.
Oh, and btw, Trump has totally squandered away his campaign centrepiece with his pathetic pandemic respo ...[text shortened]... Americans from entering their country. Including Canada.
Nice job on the COVID-19 response, btw...

1) It means rich people got richer. That's all it means. In reality they got richer not by building wealth but by squeezing it out of the lower classes.

@athousandyoung said
1) It means rich people got richer. That's all it means. In reality they got richer not by building wealth but by squeezing it out of the lower classes.

Actually, the best case Trump can make is higher wages, which have grown at 3% a year, and his taking millions off of food stamps, while the dems WANT people on food stamps, dependent on the government, creating democratic voters. Also, his economy opened up tremendous job opportunities whereby the lower classes that you mention could become the rich people you mention.

Another thing he did that O did not give a hoot about was help the veterans. But, I guess that the posters here who don't like police don't like veterans.

@athousandyoung said
1) It means rich people got richer. That's all it means. In reality they got richer not by building wealth but by squeezing it out of the lower classes.

That's utter bullshot

Due to making taxes more fair on American businessmen, a flood of cash
came in from Europe, mostly, where it was being sheltered. They brought
the cash back to the US and invested.

The American worker was treated to two things, JOBS, and tax cuts in their pay
The American workers got a big boost due to Trump's moves.

And speaking of "squeezing it out of the lower class", As best I know, the
federal government STRIPS the paycheck of poor American workers.

But you're Ok with that, right? Done at the point of an IRS gun and you're cool with it

@earl-of-trumps said
That's utter bullshot

Due to making taxes more fair on American businessmen, a flood of cash
came in from Europe, mostly, where it was being sheltered. They brought
the cash back to the US and invested.

The American worker was treated to two things, JOBS, and tax cuts in their pay
The American workers got a big boost due to Trump's moves.

And speaking of "s ...[text shortened]... workers.

But you're Ok with that, right? Done at the point of an IRS gun and you're cool with it

I think the naysayers need to get over the fact that Mr. Smith starts a biz in his garage, all his, he goes public, investors buy piece of the biz, all are risking their money, and they all get rich. At what point is all of this the business of any people who are not involved in the business? The posts that I see on this forum seem to take issue with what has transpired in the life of Mr. Smith and his investors, and think something needs to be done about it. It is none of their business. There are opportunities for everyone, especially since Trump got rid of Obama's regulations. I think that Obama never used the word prosperity and self reliance in his speeches. Oh, well.