23 Jul '21 20:41>
@mghrn55 saidThat doesn't rule out Pence, though.
Yup. He's looking for someone who won't do his job.
@mghrn55 saidThat doesn't rule out Pence, though.
Yup. He's looking for someone who won't do his job.
@suzianne saidAre you so naive. I understand the hate Trump thing, but surely you could read Putin's eyes as he regarded, with disdainful surmise, the wimp Biden sitting across from him.'
Shocking.
@moonbus saidYou fellers leave out so much, you never close your comments. You should have said, ""but to be fair, Obama used the Atty General and the DOJ to actually spy, and also the IRS with that Lois Lerner person to check up on Republicans"".
It was never about Trump's policies or so-called achievements. It was always about HIM, the way he ran roughshod over democratic procedures, collapsed the separation of powers, made the DoJ into his own private investigative agency, and turned the GOP into a cowed mob of cheerleaders.
@sonhouse saidCommunal.... a derivative of the word communism. I have a feeling soe of your 'group' members would not like you associating yourself with them. Of course, it is a given that you are a member of a group, a mob. But a commune....a Collective! Brrrrr
@AverageJoe1
You understand NOTHING of our communal hatred of Trump. Like you would EVER actually think for yourself.
You fukking IGNORE the FACT JACK that Trump for one thing, cannot run his OWN businesses, he has gone into bankruptcy some 6 times and now he gave a good shot to running the COUNTRY into bankruptcy. He did more damage to the US than ANY other bad POTUS in ...[text shortened]... udgements?
Did I get your answer right? Is that going to be the gist of your so called rebuttal?0
@averagejoe1 saidWonder who Putin prefers ?
Are you so naive. I understand the hate Trump thing, but surely you could read Putin's eyes as he regarded, with disdainful surmise, the wimp Biden sitting across from him.'
So you think Biden went back to his cabinet and said he thinks Biden will be "great for us in negotiations, I think we will get a long to make the world a better place...." Or, did he say we will eat this twerp's lunch. Suzianne?
@mghrn55 saidSince.you don't know the 'pocket theory' for sure, why use that in a solid argument?
Wonder who Putin prefers ?
Biden sitting across from him ?
Or Trump sitting in his pocket ?
@sonhouse saidYou don't seriously think that anyone on this Forum will rebut your thoughtful posts? Have you ever had one? A rebuttal, that is. I hate it for you. It would be better if you retreat back to your bunker of monitors, and report to us when they bring it all down on Trump.
@AverageJoe1
So THAT is your big rebuttal? Clearly you cannot think for yourself.
Try it sometime, I know you might break your brain doing that but just TRY sometime, work through the utter BULLSHYTE puked out by Fox News and Newsmax and other ultrarighwingnutjob outfits, the companies should be SUED and the perps put in prison for TREASON against the US constitution.
B ...[text shortened]... Trump, that is preposterous.
But don't worry, be happy and keep your head firmly up your own ass.
@sonhouse saidYou win...but I first must take a class in 'The Art of Rebutting Sonhouse". You can thank me later, as you will never see that phrase again!!! 🙂 😆 😛 😳 😳
@AverageJoe1
In other words, sidestep actual rebuttal by posting useless BULLSHTYE. Just another indication of you not being able to think for yourself. REBUT my statements, try it, maybe you will actually learn something.
@sh76 saidI'm inclined to believe either or both Ford in 1976 and Nixon in 1972 probably would have.
I wonder who the last Republican presidential candidate was who'd win a world election against a democratic presidential candidate.
I'm guessing you might have to go back to Eisenhower.