27 Jun 22
@sonhouse said@Racist
@Mott-The-Hoople
You POS, the JOB of SCOTUS is to follow tradition for one thing, 50 GODDAM YEARS of tradition in this case you pumpkin fukker.
27 Jun 22
@sonhouse said@Liar
@Earl-of-Trumps
And you don't even know what truth is if it came up and bit you on the ass.
And I sincerely hope it does.
This SCOTUS bunch just went rogue and now they are just the puppets of the religious ultrarightwingnuts.
and stop using my lines
27 Jun 22
@jj-adams saidIt was flippant response.
The framers never said anything about the number of justices being tied into the population.
The thought of 500 justices is retarded.
There's 13 United States Circuit Courts of Appeals, so how about 1 SCOTUS judge for each? Right now, we have some Justices are allotted multiple Circuit Court assignments. https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/circuitassignments.aspx
27 Jun 22
@sonhouse saidNo,,,no, that is not their job. You could look up their 'job' on google. It don't say that, no sir. Let us know what it say.
@Mott-The-Hoople
You POS, the JOB of SCOTUS is to follow tradition for one thing, 50 GODDAM YEARS of tradition in this case you pumpkin fukker.
I hope you feel better today, Sonhouse.
@no1marauder saidYou might not be able to absorb this, but how bout 9 supreme court judges. Nine. A good number. Actually that is what it is now, so why change it? It has worked for over 200 years. 200 years.
It was flippant response.
There's 13 United States Circuit Courts of Appeals, so how about 1 SCOTUS judge for each? Right now, we have some Justices are allotted multiple Circuit Court assignments. https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/circuitassignments.aspx
Why are libs up in arms about changing every facet of our society? A judge doesn't rule in your favor, so, like FDR, try to get more judges to water down the court???? What is the REAL reason for all this? Are you so unhappy? Someone got more stuff than you got? Someone of a different culture won't let you into their club? What is the deal?
27 Jun 22
@averagejoe1 saidA group of religious extremists stripping away women’s rights.
You might not be able to absorb this, but how bout 9 supreme court judges. Nine. A good number. Actually that is what it is now, so why change it? It has worked for over 200 years. 200 years.
Why are libs up in arms about changing every facet of our society? A judge doesn't rule in your favor, so, like FDR, try to get more judges to water down the court???? ...[text shortened]... tuff than you got? Someone of a different culture won't let you into their club? What is the deal?
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 142597
27 Jun 22
@shavixmir saidnot to mention correctly ruling on the constitution as written
A group of religious extremists stripping away women’s rights.
27 Jun 22
@shavixmir saidOK, you have your point, religious extremists.....Shav, you have been only too happy to tell us you are an atheist. Is that why you throw the word 'religious' in there. Go Shav. What, pray tell, is that reference supposed to mean.
A group of religious extremists stripping away women’s rights.
If you want to say extremists want to strip women's rights, that may well be. Why say religious?
These posts are full of unnecessary irrelevant fluff. I'm Busy!!!
27 Jun 22
@averagejoe1 saidI think this would be an interesting discussion for both factions. (l love that word). So, why here,2022, do we need to add judges to the court? Be honest. FDR was not enjoying their rulings. Goodness gracious.
You might not be able to absorb this, but how bout 9 supreme court judges. Nine. A good number. Actually that is what it is now, so why change it? It has worked for over 200 years. 200 years.
Why are libs up in arms about changing every facet of our society? A judge doesn't rule in your favor, so, like FDR, try to get more judges to water down the court???? ...[text shortened]... tuff than you got? Someone of a different culture won't let you into their club? What is the deal?
27 Jun 22
@mott-the-hoople saidWhere does it state, in the constitution, that abortions are not allowed?
not to mention correctly ruling on the constitution as written
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 142597
@shavixmir saidabortion is not mentioned in the constitution, therefore the scotus lacks the power to allow it or deny it. they returned the issue to the states where it rightly belongs.
Where does it state, in the constitution, that abortions are not allowed?
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
27 Jun 22
@shavixmir saidWhere does it state in the constitution that murder rape arson throwing acid in someone's face and pinning you down and crapping in your mouth is not allowed?
Where does it state, in the constitution, that abortions are not allowed?