Debates
05 Feb 13
07 Feb 13
3 edits
Originally posted by bill718You have no idea what you're talking about. This would be a grave threat to our society no matter who was President. You don't agree that extrajudicial execution of Americans who do not pose an immediate threat to American lives is a constitutional crisis of the highest order? Have you ever even read the Constitution? Just start with the Fourteenth Amendment, for Christ's sake.
Susquatch... If George W Bush had started a program like this, you'd be praising his efforts as a bold step to "keep America safe." Stop being such a hypocrite! 😲😲😲
Stop making this about me (as liberals love to do; attack the messenger), and talk about the issue, or get the hell out.
07 Feb 13
Originally posted by sasquatch672Mr. Sasquatch, if the authorities feel that certain people pose a threat to
You have no idea what you're talking about. This would be a grave threat to our society no matter who was President. You don't agree that extrajudicial execution of Americans who do not pose an immediate threat to American lives is a constitutional crisis of the highest order? Have you ever even read the Constitution? Just start with the Fourteenth ...[text shortened]... as liberals love to do; attack the messenger), and talk about the issue, or get the hell out.
national security, then it is up to the FBI the NSA and Homeland Security
to deal with that threat.
This might involve the use of extreme prejudice
which is military speak for take the ******* out.
If one takes the oath to be an American Citizen
and then renounces that oath to become an
enemy of the State, the powers that be must
act in an appropriate manner to deal with that
person. It does not necessarily mean kill them.
08 Feb 13
The post that was quoted here has been removedI consider your long-winded and self-serving trash not worthy of reply. You are arguably more ignorant of facts that are uncomfortable for you to deal with and rely on the trashiest argument technique of killing the messenger.
I will continue to expose both your hypocrisy, and your arrogance, and every time you you do your thing I will ROTFLOL, especially when you cite the absolute best know practitioner of your trade, No1.
08 Feb 13
The post that was quoted here has been removed"But Randy Weaver and Kevin Harris had guns and were trained in using them.
If they had surrendered earlier to the US government, would Randy Weaver's
wife and son have been killed?"
If bullfrogs had wings........... Brave men defend their families, even against all odds. By the way US juries acquitted them of any wrongdoing, almost without deliberation. The US Government was wrong, not Randy Weaver.
His wife would not have been killed if heavily armed military force wasn't sent in to violate his rights, shooting a dog and his son. Ruby Ridge was in the end not defensible, and Randy had to come out eventually for food and water. Lon Horiuchi had no justification for shooting Vicki Weaver and should have be prosecuted for homicide, not promoted.