@metal-brain said
Don't kill the messenger. This is the same person who said SARS2 is man made. Facebook no longer bans posts claiming SARS2 is man made. You should take Luc Montagnier seriously this time.
https://rairfoundation.com/bombshell-nobel-prize-winner-reveals-covid-vaccine-is-creating-variants/
Think for once.
What causes mutations in a virus? Well, in anything? Actually, go back one step: what is a mutation?
So, if the more replications or procreations there are the higher the chances of mutations are, then the less replications or procreations, the lower the chances of mutations.
Then outside influences:
Mutations basically happen all the time. Each mutation has a chance of being effective (call it positive) or ineffective (call it pointless).
This means that a mutation when happening, in context with the environment it is in (outside influence), can be positive or pointless. Pointless mutations fail and die out (generally… although republicans seem to thrive) and positive mutations are better for the “thing” in the environment it is in and helps the “thing” to survive.
So, to look at Covid-19 (sars-cov-2):
- the higher the replication, the more mutations will occur.
- the more mutations, the higher the chances of the virus achieving a positive mutation (good for it, bad for the hosts… us… ) .
- the lower the R-number, the fewer mutations.
- fewer mutations mean less chance of a positive mutation.
- summed up: fewer mutations = better than many mutations.
In an unvaccinated environment positive mutations will be along the lines of anything which helps the virus live and spread (longer incubation periods but still being able to spread, longer sick beds, easier spreading, etc.)
In a vaccinated environment many of these same mutations are pointless, so the mutations that are positive will be along the lines of spreading faster than the vaccination roll-out, major changes to the antigen and avoiding antibodies
Mass vaccination leads to a much lower R-number, meaning less mutations and less chance of a positive mutation.
And the mutation needed for Sars-COV-2 to be positive in a vaccinated community is a complicated change (changing the antigen is a bigger step than producing more spikes, for example).
Ergo, less chance of a dangerous mutation to humanity.