New meme: Republicans in Ruins.

@sonhouse said
That pretty much sums up the present trumpite repubs.

I like "Republicans in TATTERS' myself.

Zombies won the house and we can't WAIT to see Jim Jordan sputter about impeachment and such.
The real question is will the zombies tank the government come time to extend the debt limit and such, or will they actually do their governing duty like they were hired to do? We ...[text shortened]... will be zombies V Dems.
I HOPE they impeach Biden. His approval rating will go through the roof🙂

I hope they impeach Biden too.
Democrats stand for creeping Stalinism. You hate Russia so much you are trying to become just like them. I should say democrats are for creeping fascism though. After all, they do support arming neo nazis in Ukraine. Obama signed the 2016 Consolidated Appropriations Act into law which lifted the ban on funding nazis in Ukraine effectively undoing John Conyers work.

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2016/02/01/azov-f01.html

Despite being half black, Obama helped arm nazis in Ukraine. So did most of congress. Here is an excerpt from the link above:

"According to the Nation, the Defense Department subsequently began exerting pressure on the House Defense Appropriations Committee to withdraw the proposed amendment, arguing that the restriction was redundant. According to this specious line of reasoning, funding of the Azov Regiment should already be prohibited by the Leahy Law, which establishes that “No assistance shall be furnished ... to any unit of the security forces of a foreign country if the Secretary of State has credible information that such unit has committed a gross violation of human rights.”

So funding of the Azov Regiment should already be prohibited by the Leahy Law, which establishes that “No assistance shall be furnished ... to any unit of the security forces of a foreign country if the Secretary of State has credible information that such unit has committed a gross violation of human rights.”

If we live in a democracy why isn't the Leahy Law being enforced?

@sonhouse said
@Earl-of-Trumps
If that is the case why is Trump not in prison RIGHT NOW for stealing highly classified docs? Surely the CIA would be the one to bitch about national security.
Oh, wait, I FORGOT, Trump is above the low. Stupid of me to think otherwise.

He is not in prison because he has not been proven to have stolen anything. Like many of your posts, this is where this one is going.🗑️

@metal-brain said
I hope they impeach Biden too.
Democrats stand for creeping Stalinism. You hate Russia so much you are trying to become just like them. I should say democrats are for creeping fascism though. After all, they do support arming neo nazis in Ukraine. Obama signed the 2016 Consolidated Appropriations Act into law which lifted the ban on funding nazis in Ukraine effectively u ...[text shortened]... oss violation of human rights.”

If we live in a democracy why isn't the Leahy Law being enforced?

You're a little behind the times; Congress banned any funds from going to Azov Battalion 4 years ago. https://thehill.com/policy/defense/380483-congress-bans-arms-to-controversial-ukrainian-militia-linked-to-neo-nazis/

@sonhouse said


I like "Republicans in TATTERS' myself.

Be careful what you wish for. Y'all need us a WHOLE lot more than we need you. The rich bankers, for instance. Can you imagine Marauder stepping into bankers' shoes, with Wildgrass, MG, et al, manning he teller windows? They would be handing out money left and right. But then, you like such messes in our economy.

@no1marauder said
You're a little behind the times; Congress banned any funds from going to Azov Battalion 4 years ago. https://thehill.com/policy/defense/380483-congress-bans-arms-to-controversial-ukrainian-militia-linked-to-neo-nazis/

You're a little behind on reading your own links. Here is an excerpt from your link:

"House-passed spending bills for the past three years have included a ban on U.S. aid to Ukraine from going to the Azov Battalion, but the provision was stripped out before final passage each year."

What was that again? Who is behind?

Here is another excerpt from your link:

"But proponents of a ban specific to Azov say the Leahy Law did not preclude it from getting aid, since the secretary of State has never made such a determination about the group."

@metal-brain said
You're a little behind on reading your own links. Here is an excerpt from your link:

"House-passed spending bills for the past three years have included a ban on U.S. aid to Ukraine from going to the Azov Battalion, but the provision was stripped out before final passage each year."

What was that again? Who is behind?

Here is another excerpt from your link:

"B ...[text shortened]... from getting aid, since the secretary of State has never made such a determination about the group."

My statement remains accurate, your incredibly poor reading comprehension doesn't change that. Congress specifically banned any funds going to the Azov Battalion four years ago just like the link says.

@no1marauder said
My statement remains accurate, your incredibly poor reading comprehension doesn't change that. Congress specifically banned any funds going to the Azov Battalion four years ago just like the link says.

That doesn't mean they are banned now.
How many times was the ban lifted and reimposed? All you have done is proven the neo nazi Azov Batallion was banned from getting weapons more than once.

You need to prove the ban was not lifted again since then.

@metal-brain said
That doesn't mean they are banned now.
How many times was the ban lifted and reimposed? All you have done is proven the neo nazi Azov Batallion was banned from getting weapons more than once.

You need to prove the ban was not lifted again since then.

That's ridiculous; I have showed the ban was enacted into law, so the burden is on you to show it was repealed.

@no1marauder said
That's ridiculous; I have showed the ban was enacted into law, so the burden is on you to show it was repealed.

How many times was it enacted into law? I already proved it was repealed once so simple math shows that was enacted into law at least twice. You also posted an article that proves congress removed the ban to arm neo nazis for 3 years, so that proves congress was arming neo nazis for at least that long. The USA also has a history of working with nazis against the USSR. This is not something that just started recently.

https://ips-dc.org/the_cias_worst-kept_secret_newly_declassified_files_confirm_united_states_collaboration_with_nazis/

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202203/1254217.shtml

Maybe they finally banned it because Israel was arming nazis in Ukraine so there was no need. Jews arming Nazis. Isn't that ironic? Israel is obviously a puppet nation of the USA. Why else would they be arming neo Nazis?

https://therealnews.com/israel-is-arming-ukraines-blatantly-neo-nazi-militia-the-azov-battalion