Go back
MAGA maniac strikes again?

MAGA maniac strikes again?

Debates


@wajoma said
No.1 do you believe Depape is a MAGA maniac?

Edit in case you missed it the first time: Because that is my point of contention.

I am prepared to discuss why your post does not back kevs rantings, we're trying to ascertain are you defending kevs rantings, are you claiming DePape was a 'MAGA maniac' and from there we'll see how close you are to the dunce corner (and kev)
Yes, I do. From my first post on this page:

In one post from last month, an author under DePape’s name wrote that journalists who denied the former president’s fraud claims about the 2020 presidential election “should be dragged straight out into the street and shot,” according to the AP."

https://thehill.com/homenews/3711633-what-we-know-about-suspected-paul-pelosi-attacker/

"A CBS News review of suspected social media posts by DePape turned up conspiracy theories about Holocaust denial, pedophiles in the government, and claims that Democratic officials run child sex rings."

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/paul-pelosi-attack-suspect-target-list-sources-say-nancy-pelosi-husband/

From his statement:

" In the course of the interview, DEPAPE articulated he
viewed Nancy as the “leader of the pack” of lies told by the Democratic Party.
DEPAPE also later explained that by breaking Nancy’s kneecaps, she would then
have to be wheeled into Congress, which would show other Members of Congress
there were consequences to actions. "

So yes - he certainly rates as a MAGA and a maniac.


@no1marauder said
Yes, I do. From my first post on this page:

In one post from last month, an author under DePape’s name wrote that journalists who denied the former president’s fraud claims about the 2020 presidential election “should be dragged straight out into the street and shot,” according to the AP."

https://thehill.com/homenews/3711633-what-we-know-about-suspected-paul-pelosi ...[text shortened]... ngress
there were consequences to actions. "

So yes - he certainly rates as a MAGA and a maniac.
None of that is MAGA.

The '"leader of the pack" of lies' etc could just as easily be a disgruntled Democrat not happy with what pelosi is doing to the party. You're claiming to know what DePape is thinking.

The MAGA thing can't be made to stick. And it reeks of desperation that you'd try to twist it in that way. From kev yes, from yourself, well people change I guess.,


@wajoma said
None of that is MAGA.

The '"leader of the pack" of lies' etc could just as easily be a disgruntled Democrat not happy with what pelosi is doing to the party. You're claiming to know what DePape is thinking.

The MAGA thing can't be made to stick. And it reeks of desperation that you'd try to twist it in that way. From kev yes, from yourself, well people change I guess.,
WTF is it with people on this Forum? Why is it impossible for them to simply admit they are wrong?

MAGA is a shorthand description of Trump followers used, most of all, by the Donald himself. And only a MAGA would say something like this:

"In one post from last month, an author under DePape’s name wrote that journalists who denied the former president’s fraud claims about the 2020 presidential election “should be dragged straight out into the street and shot,” according to the AP."

And while a lot of progressives are unhappy with Pelosi, I've yet to hear any of them be in favor of breaking her kneecaps.

It reeks of idiocy, dishonesty or flat out ignorance to try to pretend that DePape isn't a MAGA as made clear by his own words.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Howbout everyone just let the DoJ do their job instead of speculating.

The suspect has already confessed he intended to hold Nancy Pelosi hostage and interrogate her under threat of breaking her kneecaps if she didn’t tell the truth.

He’ll be charged with multiple state and federal felonies.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/31/politics/paul-pelosi-suspect-charged/index.html


@no1marauder said
Yes, I do. From my first post on this page:

In one post from last month, an author under DePape’s name wrote that journalists who denied the former president’s fraud claims about the 2020 presidential election “should be dragged straight out into the street and shot,” according to the AP."

https://thehill.com/homenews/3711633-what-we-know-about-suspected-paul-pelosi ...[text shortened]... ngress
there were consequences to actions. "

So yes - he certainly rates as a MAGA and a maniac.
""A CBS News review of suspected social media posts by DePape "

Show the proof, not some state run media article...and while you're at it explain why the were in their underwear

2 edits

@mott-the-hoople said
""A CBS News review of suspected social media posts by DePape "

Show the proof, not some state run media article...and while you're at it explain why the were in their underwear
If Pelosi was in his underwear, it was because he was surprised in his house at 2:30 in the morning. What do you expect him to be wearing in bed at that time - a three piece suit?

None of the police reports nor the charging instrument I have already presented say DePape was in his underwear, so you got some bad information from unreliable sources that you, being a gullible right winger, were all too willing to uncritically accept.

Take a look here: https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1548106/download?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery


@no1marauder said
If Pelosi was in his underwear, it was because he was surprised in his house at 2:30 in the morning. What do you expect him to be wearing in bed at that time - a three piece suit?

None of the police reports nor the charging instrument I have already presented say DePape was in his underwear, so you got some bad information from unreliable sources that you, being a gullible right winger, was all too willing to uncritically accept.
Something like what you're doing with your 'MAGA maniac' ravings.


@wajoma said
Something like what you're doing with your 'MAGA maniac' ravings.
I don't really consider a sworn affidavit from an FBI agent based on a recorded statement from the defendant as an "unreliable source".


@no1marauder said
I don't really consider a sworn affidavit from an FBI agent based on a recorded statement from the defendant as an "unreliable source".
The FBI is calling DePape a 'MAGA maniac"?


@wajoma said
The FBI is calling DePape a 'MAGA maniac"?
LMAO!

Give it up and admit you're wrong. The FBI affidavit confirms that DePape broke into Pelosi's house to kidnap her because she was lying and his social media posts say exactly what he thought she was lying about.

The local prosecutors are going to file additional charges tomorrow and they'll surely present more details in case you want to keep smearing egg on your face.


@no1marauder said
LMAO!

Give it up and admit you're wrong. The FBI affidavit confirms that DePape broke into Pelosi's house to kidnap her because she was lying and his social media posts say exactly what he thought she was lying about.

The local prosecutors are going to file additional charges tomorrow and they'll surely present more details in case you want to keep smearing egg on your face.
If more comes to light then more comes to light. Calling pelosi a liar is not exclusively MAGA or republican, you'll be hoping there's more cause you're getting very close to kev boobing in the dunce corner.


@no1marauder said
If Pelosi was in his underwear, it was because he was surprised in his house at 2:30 in the morning. What do you expect him to be wearing in bed at that time - a three piece suit?

None of the police reports nor the charging instrument I have already presented say DePape was in his underwear, so you got some bad information from unreliable sources that you, being a gull ...[text shortened]... ps://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1548106/download?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery
"/www.justice.gov/"

LOL...the same ones that think parents are domestic terrorists?

Vote Up
Vote Down

The same ones who think a man can get pregnant?


@kannstipated said
The same ones who think a man can get pregnant?
πŸ˜‚

Vote Up
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
πŸ˜‚
What a bunch of babbling idiots.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.