03 Jan 06
Originally posted by RBHILLyes i agree I only joined because I read a post complaining about the lack of numbers and decided even though I have no chance I would enter. As it happens I missed all the big guns in the first round but then again the top ranked has alreddy blundered a game away in group 43, so we are once again reminded we are only one blunder away from defeat
To bad we couldn't get more people in the 2006 tournament, then there was in the 2005 tournament.
04 Jan 06
Originally posted by Whats goin on ehI'm group 33. Looked through most of the groups to find me. I dont know why Russ didnt put a group # next to each player,..save the headache of going through all of the groups! Sincerely, Trains44
I'm in group 31, but the highest player is rated at 1642. I'm still at the bottom, though.
04 Jan 06
2 edits
Originally posted by propawnkillergroup 2 ... wonderboy75 2080 v XanthosNZ 1970
I've skimmed through the groups and checked for the "favourites"(1950+ current rating by my definition) . The interesting groups in this way are 2,3,4,16 and 33, because they have 2 favourits each. Another 15 groups have one favourite and in the other 20 at least 20 of the "underdogs" will go through.
group 3 ... sealion 2189 v jamjamjoe 1998
group 4 ... cludi 2232 v DoJoCleaning 2052
group 16 ... nicohuyboom 2228 v awrightus 2080
group 33 ... Quirine 2047 v TRAINS44 1987
posted by a will-struggle-and-might-make-it-through-underdog; group 29.
- Joined
- 16 Dec 04
- Moves
- 56692
06 Jan 06
Originally posted by buffalobillIf it wasn't for you two pesky kids I'd fancy my chances 😞
I'm in 10 and with a 1931 player above me, I've got a reasonable chance of getting through. This should be interesting.
Don't think I've ever beaten anyone above 1900 so I'm gunning for you buffalobill 😉
Should be interesting between you two though that's for sure.