20 May '19 22:40>
This post is unavailable.
Please refer to our posting guidelines.
@moonbus saidYes they are equivalent, and no I won’t cite a passage which says they are equivalent; it’s your thread and your claim, the onus of the burden of proof is one you.
No, it isn't a direct manifestation. Read the passages. When God directs Abraham to kill his son, there is no mention of "an angel of the Lord" but there is when the command is later countermanded.
EDIT: I'm going by what it actually says in the Bible. Sometimes "God said X" and sometimes "an angel of the Lord said X". Are these equivalent? Do they have the s ...[text shortened]... in Galatians, 'believe what I, Paul told you, even if an angel tells you otherwise.' ?
@moonbus saidBecause there is a difference between a named “Angel” such as Michael or Gabriel or Lucifer, and the “angel of the lord”.
So, why would Abraham not have thought, 'hey, this may be a fallen angel, tempting me to disobey God's command? The last time someone disobeyed a direct order from God, because an angel said it would be ok, it got everybody into a hell of a lot of trouble.' ??
@moonbus saidThe work you will be looking for is Fear & Trembling.
Can you cite a reference to Kierkegaard's work? I have Kierkegaard on my shelf, he's on the 'read this someday' list but haven't gotten round to him yet.
@eladar saidI hate to write this, but seriously, are you stupid?
Seriously, anyone know why Abraham would not know about Paul's warning?
@suzianne saidNo, moonbus is.
I hate to write this, but seriously, are you stupid?
The archangel, Michael, is the chief angel in terms of power and authority. The Scriptures clearly indicate that Michael is another name for Jesus Christ.—1 Thessalonians 4:16; Jude 9.
@sonship saidSo your logic is:
@KellyJay
Exodus 3:2 - That was Christ before incarnation as a man.
A number of times Christ appears as the Angel of Jehovah in the Old Testament before His incarnation as a man through the virgin Mary.
@eladar saidHe did not say that. You are putting words in his mouth.
No, moonbus is.
He is the one wondering why Abraham did not follow Paul's instruction. He is wondering why the instruction would apply to Joseph Smith and why not Abraham.
@suzianne saidHe started this thread in response to our discussion in the mormon thread. You can find an invitation to continue tge discussiin about angels and galatians 1 in that mormon thread.
He did not say that. You are putting words in his mouth.