14 Jan 12
Originally posted by FMFthe reason FMF, the reason, try stating the reason. Is it so much to ask? how silly of
Well you were addressing me. Why won't you address what I have actually said?
me to have assumed that you might have been following the thread and caught void
spirits comments and managed to put them into context of the thread as a whole.
14 Jan 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI gave my answer on page 1 but you sidestepped it. And you're still dodging it on page 3.
the reason FMF, the reason, try stating the reason. Is it so much to ask? how silly of
me to have assumed that you might have been following the thread and caught void
spirits comments and managed to put them into context of the thread as a whole.
14 Jan 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieyou're not listening. look up a few posts, i listed adultery is a derivative of a social contract.
this is not a reason, its some kind of formulation of an alternative arrangement????? relevance???? Why is it not reasonable for a person to be asked to desist from,
adultery.
it's not just "adultery" in you book. it's a coercion. the "law" gives only one formula of how a person should behave and no choice is left to the person; that sexual relations must be excluded to be between a man and a woman; and that the two individuals must be "married" under a contractual obligation and that violation of the contract results in execution.
it's a series of laws that controls the sexuality of people and such laws are immoral. you cannot legally mandate a person's sexuality.
further, you listed that other people are involved in "adultery." this is not always the case. all sex outside of marriage is considered "adultery." this means that any two couples who have sex outside of marriage are committing adultery by your book. and if you go by what christ said, even thinking about it is adultery. woe unto all those teenagers!
14 Jan 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieVoidspirit and I are different posters. We have said different things. Why are you refusing to discuss my answer to your question?
how silly of me to have assumed that you might have been following the thread and caught void spirits comments and managed to put them into context of the thread as a whole.
14 Jan 12
Originally posted by VoidSpiritso your objection is that it limits sexual freedom within the bounds of marraige and
you're not listening. look up a few posts, i listed adultery is a derivative of a social contract.
it's not just "adultery" in you book. it's a coercion. the "law" gives only one formula of how a person should behave and no choice is left to the person; that sexual relations must be excluded to be between a man and a woman; and that the two individu ...[text shortened]... t christ said, even thinking about it is adultery. woe unto all those teenagers!
limits it to between a man and a women. Is it unreasonable to ask persons to refrain
from pre marital sex and to remain faithful to their partner after marraige, if so, why.
14 Jan 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIf 'God forbids it' is all you've got with regard to homosexuality, why would anyone who does not subscribe to your belief system think it was anything other than "unreasonable"?
you have stated it and i thank you for it, what else is there to say unless you have anything to add to it.
14 Jan 12
1 edit
Originally posted by VoidSpiritno, you proffered opinions, you have only substantiated those opinions in your latest
between you and me, we listed several reasons. i wonder what specific reason he's looking for?
text, that it limits sexual activity. You have not stated why this might be a reasonable
request or otherwise.
14 Jan 12
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFyou tell me, I've only been asking you for 3 pages now. Jeez its like pulling teeth.
If 'God forbids it' is all you've got with regard to homosexuality, why would anyone who does not subscribe to your belief system think it was anything other than "unreasonable"?