Originally posted by @fmfThere's only one good reason why a person is an "elite" chess player regardless of race, religion or national origin, and that is he wins games.
That would have been better than what you decided to lead with. So I was wrong. You did have something better to offer than what you chose to lead with.
Originally posted by @secondsonThis'd have made a good leading post from you. Better than the addressed-to-divegeester one.
There's only one good reason why a person is an "elite" chess player regardless of race, religion or national origin, and that is he wins games.
Originally posted by @secondsonI concurred with divegeester's first post on page 1. I thought it was apt given the nature of the OP. In fact, I suspect that you agree.
In your opinion.
Still, your reply to my reply to divegeester's reply to the OP would have been better suited if it had been directed at divegeester.
Originally posted by @secondsonI think it was funny. The OP is Christian froth at its most facile.
I thought sonship' reply was "apt" and relevant to the OP, but divegeester's reply was trite, mean spirited and without substance.