22 Jul '18 12:34>
Originally posted by @secondsonDo they still use words like “behooves” in conversation where you live?
It ill behooves you to find something positive to say about anything a Christian posts in this forum doesn't it?
Originally posted by @secondsonDo they still use words like “behooves” in conversation where you live?
It ill behooves you to find something positive to say about anything a Christian posts in this forum doesn't it?
Originally posted by @fmfThere's only one good reason why a person is an "elite" chess player regardless of race, religion or national origin, and that is he wins games.
That would have been better than what you decided to lead with. So I was wrong. You did have something better to offer than what you chose to lead with.
Originally posted by @divegeesterDo they still have conversations where you live?
Do they still use words like “behooves” in conversation where you live?
Originally posted by @secondsonThis'd have made a good leading post from you. Better than the addressed-to-divegeester one.
There's only one good reason why a person is an "elite" chess player regardless of race, religion or national origin, and that is he wins games.
Originally posted by @secondsonWow, I’m stumped at you razor sharp quips.
Do they still have conversations where you live?
Originally posted by @fmfIn your opinion.
This'd have made a good leading post from you. Better than the addressed-to-divegeester one.
Originally posted by @secondsonI concurred with divegeester's first post on page 1. I thought it was apt given the nature of the OP. In fact, I suspect that you agree.
In your opinion.
Still, your reply to my reply to divegeester's reply to the OP would have been better suited if it had been directed at divegeester.
Originally posted by @divegeesterAre you bitter because my quips are sharper than your quips?
Wow, I’m stumped at you razor sharp quips.
Originally posted by @fmfI thought sonship' reply was "apt" and relevant to the OP, but divegeester's reply was trite, mean spirited and without substance.
I concurred with divegeester's first post on page 1. I thought it was apt given the nature of the OP. In fact, I suspect that you agree.
Originally posted by @secondsonI think it was funny. The OP is Christian froth at its most facile.
I thought sonship' reply was "apt" and relevant to the OP, but divegeester's reply was trite, mean spirited and without substance.
Originally posted by @secondsonOk, can you explain, precisely please, why my first post was either trite, mean spirited or without substance?
I thought sonship' reply was "apt" and relevant to the OP, but divegeester's reply was trite, mean spirited and without substance.
Originally posted by @secondsonHave you stopped beating your children?
Are you bitter because my quips are sharper than your quips?
Originally posted by @fmfOf course you do. It's in your nature.
I think it was funny. The OP is Christian froth at its most facile.
Originally posted by @divegeesterTrite because it lacked originality.
Ok, can you explain, precisely please, why my first post was either trite, mean spirited or without substance?
Originally posted by @divegeesterYes. Now they beat me.
Have you stopped beating your children?