@ghost-of-a-duke saidPublic acts of violence constitute terrorism regardless of what you or Mandela may say about this. What Mandela pleaded guilty to was decided by a court of law to be terrorism.
In court, Mandela said clearly that 'he' did not view his actions as terrorism. For you to say this is neither here nor there when it completely refutes Hammond's assertion just goes to show what a complete lack of integrity you have as a poster.
23 Dec 18
@wolfgang59 saidI see you have shifted the goal posts now that you can’t back up your Ghandi comments.
No.
Sunday schools were begun to indoctrinate the young.
If literacy was the aim why did it take the Church 1700 years to start?
Why did Christianity not want the bible translated into local languages?
Why was the printing press and printing of bibles viewed as dangerous to the Church?
Read some history instead of lies from a South African White Supremacist.
@dj2becker saidNo.
I see you have shifted the goal posts now that you can’t back up your Ghandi comments.
Just highlighting another piece of nonsense from your original post.
@dj2becker saidNo he did not.
Public acts of violence constitute terrorism regardless of what you or Mandela may say about this. What Mandela pleaded guilty to was decided by a court of law to be terrorism.
That has been shown to you very clearly.
@wolfgang59 saidNATO seems to agree with Hammond on the issue that public acts of violence constitute terrorism which is what Mandela admitted to.
No he did not.
That has been shown to you very clearly.
So much for people writing EVERYTHING in an autobiography.
23 Dec 18
@wolfgang59 saidBack up your Ghandi claim or withdraw it.
No.
Just highlighting another piece of nonsense from your original post.
@dj2becker saidHammond claims that Mandela said that he (Mandela) committed acts of terrorism.
NATO seems to agree with Hammond on the issue that public acts of violence constitute terrorism which is what Mandela admitted to.
So much for people writing EVERYTHING in an autobiography.
We are not debating whether or not Mandela committed such acts.
We are not debating what others call what Mandela admitted to.
@dj2becker saidYou are claiming that Hammond was not lying when
Back up your Ghandi claim or withdraw it.
he said Ghandi had sex with his sister. It is for you to prove.
If I claim you had sex with your sister, how
would you disprove it? (Assuming it is untrue.).
@wolfgang59 saidI don't think becker's brain is capable of computing that. (Genuinely).
Hammond claims that Mandela said that he (Mandela) committed acts of terrorism.
We are not debating whether or not Mandela committed such acts.
We are not debating what others call what Mandela admitted to.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYes - perhaps I give him too much credit.
I don't think becker's brain is capable of computing that. (Genuinely).
23 Dec 18
@wolfgang59 saidFirst you need to prove that Hammond said that I have never personally heard him say it.
You are claiming that Hammond was not lying when
he said Ghandi had sex with his sister. It is for you to prove.
If I claim you had sex with your sister, how
would you disprove it? (Assuming it is untrue.).
@wolfgang59 saidYou are just using word play to try to turn Hammond into a liar because you can’t handle what is written in the OP. Public violence is terrorism. End of story.
Hammond claims that Mandela said that he (Mandela) committed acts of terrorism.
We are not debating whether or not Mandela committed such acts.
We are not debating what others call what Mandela admitted to.
23 Dec 18
@dj2becker saidJust to clarify, were the Suffragettes terrorists?
You are just using word play to try to turn Hammond into a liar because you can’t handle what is written in the OP. Public violence is terrorism. End of story.
And what about Peter, cutting off the servant's ear in an attempt to prevent the arrest of Jesus? Was he a terrorist too?
23 Dec 18
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIf they employed the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims then yes.
Just to clarify, were the Suffragettes terrorists?
And what about Peter, cutting off the servant's ear in an attempt to prevent the arrest of Jesus? Was he a terrorist too?
If not, no.
@dj2becker saidWhat is written in the opening post is mainly nonsense.
You are just using word play to try to turn Hammond into a liar because you can’t handle what is written in the OP. Public violence is terrorism. End of story.
(I have highlighted several points which you cannot respond to.)
The icing on the cake was that it was written by a known liar,
white supremacist and former army sniper who now calls
himself "Dr" without any qualifications who is trying to make
a quick buck by pandering to a moronic minority of Christians
eager to lap up his stories.
You are the one who posted the nonsense and insist we
accept it as true unless we can prove otherwise?!? Nuts.