Originally posted by googlefudgeHe probably didn't have a vision like that, but I doubt you could prove he didn't, unless he admiited to faking it. I saw no proof of that in your post. 😏
Yes. But you post directly contradicted what I had just said on the same page of the same thread.
You clearly and emphatically contradicted my post in a thread I was active in.
Actually thinking about it not responding to me in the context seems a little insulting.
You took the trouble to tell me you think I'm wrong but didn't bother to address t up your claims and direct them to the person you are
contradicting.
Make sense?
P.S. How can I get a grammer & spelll checker for RHP, so I can look good like you?
Originally posted by googlefudgeThat seems to be a rather self-centered viewpoint. It's not about you.
Yes. But you post directly contradicted what I had just said on the same page of the same thread.
You clearly and emphatically contradicted my post in a thread I was active in.
Actually thinking about it not responding to me in the context seems a little insulting.
You took the trouble to tell me you think I'm wrong but didn't bother to address t up your claims and direct them to the person you are
contradicting.
Make sense?
The person I directed my statement to was the person who created the thread and made the challenge, so naturally I directed my response to him. Why do you think it necessarily should have been addressed to you just because you had made a different response to him?
I may be wrong, but I suspect that part of his point was that it can't be proven.
BTW, that's an interesting use of the word 'curtsey'. People from the US wouldn't use it that way. Is it commonly used that way in the UK?
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneI think GF meant courtesy
BTW, that's an interesting use of the word 'curtsey'. People from the US wouldn't use it that way. Is it commonly used that way in the UK?
Noun
1.The showing of politeness in one's attitude and behavior toward others.
2.A polite speech or action, esp. one required by convention.
Although the image of you giving GF a curtsey is amusing
Noun
1. A gesture of respect or reverence made chiefly by women by bending the knees with one foot forward and lowering the body
10 Feb 13
Originally posted by wolfgang59That was my initial thought, but then given how English has been altered here, I thought I'd ask.
I think GF meant [b]courtesy
Noun
1.The showing of politeness in one's attitude and behavior toward others.
2.A polite speech or action, esp. one required by convention.
Although the image of you giving GF a curtsey is amusing
Noun
1. A gesture of respect or reverence made chiefly by women by bending the knees with one foot forward and lowering the body[/b]
Originally posted by wolfgang59Yeah I am always in trouble when I spell the word wrong but in such a way that it's a different word spelled correctly.
I think GF meant [b]courtesy
Noun
1.The showing of politeness in one's attitude and behavior toward others.
2.A polite speech or action, esp. one required by convention.
Although the image of you giving GF a curtsey is amusing
Noun
1. A gesture of respect or reverence made chiefly by women by bending the knees with one foot forward and lowering the body[/b]
The trouble of proof reading your own work is that you know what it's supposed to say and thus read that instead of
what it actually says.
Apologies for the confusion.
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneYou could well be right that a thought behind the op was that it can't be disproved.
That seems to be a rather self-centered viewpoint. It's not about you.
The person I directed my statement to was the person who created the thread and made the challenge, so naturally I directed my response to him. Why do you think it necessarily should have been addressed to you just because you had made a different response to him?
I may be wrong ...[text shortened]... sey'. People from the US wouldn't use it that way. Is it commonly used that way in the UK?
However I had just done a post rebutting (and refuting) that exact claim.
And then you come along and just state that the premise in the op is true like it's obvious and
totally ignore the fact that I just rebutted/refuted it.
It's not self centered to respond by saying "hello, I just posted a great long argument rejecting
that point, am I invisible or something?"
It is evidently NOT a given that that it is unprovable.
If you want to claim that it is you need to back it up.
Originally posted by googlefudgeIt's not self centered to respond by saying "hello, I just posted a great long argument rejecting that point, am I invisible or something?"
You could well be right that a thought behind the op was that it can't be disproved.
However I had just done a post rebutting (and refuting) that exact claim.
And then you come along and just state that the premise in the op is true like it's obvious and
totally ignore the fact that I just rebutted/refuted it.
It's not self centered to respond iven that that it is unprovable.
If you want to claim that it is you need to back it up.
No it isn't, pretentiousness aside. However that's not what you seem to be saying below. There you seem to be trying to make the case that I should have initially responded to you instead of OdBod. That does seem rather self-centered. As does what I explain at the end.
You took the trouble to tell me you think I'm wrong but didn't bother to address the comment to me
but instead "imparted your wisdom" to someone else...
It is evidently NOT a given that that it is unprovable.
No it was not presented as 'a given'. However, I'm reasonably sure that it cannot be proven wrong. Just as I'm also reasonably sure that your 'proof' is seriously flawed.
If you want to claim that it is you need to back it up.
Only from your point of view. If OdBod also does not believe that it can be proven wrong, then from the POV of my discussion with him, the 'claim' is moot.
Understand now?
Originally posted by OdBodWhat is proof in your world?
I had a vision I know it to be true ,God told me that creation occurred one hour ago. Everything we think we know is nothing more than implanted memories,and because God can do anything, the physical universe was set up exactly as we perceive it now. Prove me wrong!
I like fiction too.
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneWell you're demonstrating that you're an ass well enough.
[b]It's not self centered to respond by saying "hello, I just posted a great long argument rejecting that point, am I invisible or something?"
No it isn't, pretentiousness aside. However that's not what you seem to be saying below. There you seem to be trying to make the case that I should have initially responded to you instead of OdBod. That does ...[text shortened]... from the POV of my discussion with him, the 'claim' is moot.
Understand now?[/b]
If you can be bothered to type that many words you could have explained why you think I'm wrong.
I don't give a damn that you think I'm wrong. Only why.
If your not going to tell me I will continue working on the basis that you are wrong and ignore you till
you prove otherwise.
And I understand what your saying perfectly. I'm disagreeing with what your saying.
Understand?
10 Feb 13
Originally posted by googlefudgeTell you what, if you admit that your desire for an explanation as to why your proof is flawed has gotten the better of you and has caused you to behave in an immature manner and led you to have an unreasonable expectation that you be provided one, I'll be willing to provide you with an explanation - with the understanding that I'm under no obligation to get into a drawn-out discussion. Fair enough?
Well you're demonstrating that you're an ass well enough.
If you can be bothered to type that many words you could have explained why you think I'm wrong.
I don't give a damn that you think I'm wrong. Only why.
If your not going to tell me I will continue working on the basis that you are wrong and ignore you till
you prove otherwise.
And I ...[text shortened]... derstand what your saying perfectly. I'm disagreeing with what your saying.
Understand?
10 Feb 13
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneThat ole google some fudge will not admit he is wrong and wants everyone else to think he is right, so to disagree with him is unthinkable unless he believes you are a redneck moron like me. 😏
Tell you what, if you admit that your desire for an explanation as to why your proof is flawed has gotten the better of you and has caused you to behave in an immature manner and led you to have an unreasonable expectation that you be provided one, I'll be willing to provide you with an explanation - with the understanding that I'm under no obligation to get into a drawn-out discussion. Fair enough?
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneNo dice.
Tell you what, if you admit that your desire for an explanation as to why your proof is flawed has gotten the better of you and has caused you to behave in an immature manner and led you to have an unreasonable expectation that you be provided one, I'll be willing to provide you with an explanation - with the understanding that I'm under no obligation to get into a drawn-out discussion. Fair enough?