Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
Think of it this way. If I were interested in discussing it with you, I would have responded to the post in which you made the claim. If you hadn't responded to my post to OdBod declaring that you had proved it earlier, I would have said nothing. It's not like my response to you was unprompted. Make sense?
Yes. But you post directly contradicted what I had just said on the same page of the same thread.
You clearly and emphatically contradicted my post in a thread I was active in.
Actually thinking about it not responding to me in the context seems a little insulting.
You took the trouble to tell me you think I'm wrong but didn't bother to address the comment to me
but instead "imparted your wisdom" to someone else...
If a group of people were having a conversation and you just wandered by, and contradicted what
someone had just said but you directed your statement to someone else in the conversation would
you not expect to get a response from the person you just contradicted?
If you were not prepared to back up your claim that "This can't be proven wrong." why did you make it?
The claim in the op absolutely can be proven wrong. I just did.
If you are going to disagree out loud then have the curtsey to back it up with arguments and reasoning.
As I say if you don't want to talk about it I can't make you and wont try.
But next time before you decide to make an assertion like that directly contradicting someone else you might
want to consider having the curtsey to actually back up your claims and direct them to the person you are
contradicting.
Make sense?