Spirituality
10 Apr 17
Originally posted by sonshipChristians with dead faith do not please God.
A Prayer for to the halfway open hearted Atheist.
[quote] "Lord Jesus. You know I have no faith. But You seem to have had ALL the faith. I lay my hands on You Lord Jesus. I just identify with You. You have faith FOR me Jesus. I have none. Lord Jesus I take You as my believing One on my behalf. Be what I am not. Be all that I am not. Come with all You ...[text shortened]... all. If God is not FAITHFUL our faith means nothing at all.
God is FAITHFUL.
Living faith acknowledges that good works is an essential requirement before eternal life is granted. Christians whose lives include good works have this living faith and they please God.
11 Apr 17
Originally posted by josephwNonsense . Pointing out that a person has a 'worst' behaviour is not morally wrong in the least, and the fact that I addressed my post to a person you dislike is irrelevant.
It is also morally wrong to attack another poster by suggesting he has "worst" behavior, especially when replying to a poster that makes some of the most virulent verbal and hateful attacks against the Christian God and His followers in this forum.
Of course I wasn't pointing out that he has a 'worst behaviour' as everyone has one, what I was pointing out was that he has much worse behaviour than plagiarism. He has himself admitted to returning evil for what he perceived to be evil. If you want us to go into the details of some of his behaviour we could, but he won't be thanking you for bringing it up.
11 Apr 17
Originally posted by FMF"Why wouldn't I think I'd marked it "correctly" after 10 years of reading sonship's posts and interacting with him?"
Why wouldn't I think I'd marked it "correctly" after 10 years of reading sonship's posts and interacting with him? You a free to mark "Slippery Eel" on my card if you want.
That's what I'd like to know! Maybe because you found out you were wrong?
"You a free to mark "Slippery Eel" on my card if you want."
I don't like that one. Too mean. I think "HumorlessOne" or "Mr. Serious" might work better.
11 Apr 17
Originally posted by twhiteheadI don't dislike anyone. I just don't like some of the things they say.
Nonsense . Pointing out that a person has a 'worst' behaviour is not morally wrong in the least, and the fact that I addressed my post to a person you dislike is irrelevant.
Of course I wasn't pointing out that he has a 'worst behaviour' as everyone has one, what I was pointing out was that he has much worse behaviour than plagiarism. He has himself adm ...[text shortened]... the details of some of his behaviour we could, but he won't be thanking you for bringing it up.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Originally posted by FMF
My advice to sonship is based upon my premise that he doesn't participate here as if it were a debate and discussion board.
My advice to sonship is based upon my premise that he doesn't participate here as if it were a debate and discussion board.
People on this Forum with whom I have participated in back and forth, back and forth, debates / discussions (and sometime extensive ones) at one time or another ( a few names that immediately come to mind) -
FMF,
twhitehead,
sonhouse,
RJHinds,
Rajk999,
wolfgang59,
ThinkofOne
ThousandOne (tag?).
divegeester,
roigam,
Robbie Carrobie,
Galvaston75,
apathist,
667joe,
karoly aczel,
Ghost of Duke,
Great King Rat,
lemonlime,
JS375,
Deep Thought,
Proper Knob,
Grampy Bobby,
Dasa,
vistesd,
checkbaiter,
KellyJay,
googlefudge,
This is to name some as I check back over the pages of this Forum.
I do not have to go over the same debates/discussion with the same people if I choose not to. I can exchange views with new posters that I notice, and do.
FMF's charge that "he (sonship) doesn't participate here as if it were a debate and discussion board" is far from accurate.
Anybody can look up my posts and verify this for themselves.
Yes, often though I do not entertain comments I think of as not too pertinent.
11 Apr 17
Originally posted by sonshipIn my view, you use it too much as if it was your own personal blog or web site and not enough as a debate and discussion message boeard.My advice to sonship is based upon my premise that he doesn't participate here as if it were a debate and discussion board.
People on this Forum with whom I have participated in back and forth, back and forth, debates / discussions (and sometime extensive ones) at one time or another ( a few names that immediately come to mind) -
FMF ...[text shortened]... for themselves.
Yes, often though I do not entertain comments I think of as not too pertinent.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Hey Suzianne, that publishing function is called Living Stream Ministry, not "Ministries"
A small picky point I know - "Living Stream [singular] Ministry".
However there may be another company with a similar name.
And thanks for vouching that it has taken no deep discerning "suspecting" that I have been saying many of the same things as Nee and Lee. I know divegeester seems to fancy that he has been like the detective Columbo, skillfully "suspecting" that I am influenced by Watchman Nee and Witness Lee
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Originally posted by FMFYou're penny's worth is mighty poised to become your hundred dollar bill's worth.
In my view, you use it too much as if it was your own personal blog or web site and not enough as a debate and discussion message boeard.
If that wasn't the problem you'd be bothered by something else.
Face it FMF, you just are a militant anti-Christian Faith propagandist.
It bothers you that people have convictions founded in the Christian faith - period.
11 Apr 17
Originally posted by twhiteheadThen why did you say I don't like sonhouse? Why did you say that?
Nonsense . Pointing out that a person has a 'worst' behaviour is not morally wrong in the least, and the fact that I addressed my post to a person you dislike is irrelevant.
Of course I wasn't pointing out that he has a 'worst behaviour' as everyone has one, what I was pointing out was that he has much worse behaviour than plagiarism. He has himself adm ...[text shortened]... the details of some of his behaviour we could, but he won't be thanking you for bringing it up.
By comparison, which poster says the worse things? sonhouse or sonship?
Can you provide an example from both?
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
11 Apr 17
3 edits
Originally posted by josephwIf the behavior is so terribly amoral I would think anyone else should be able to concur (beforehand) with the examples twhitehead has ready to submit.
Then why did you say I don't like sonhouse? Why did you say that?
By comparison, which poster says the worse things? sonhouse or sonship?
Can you provide an example from both?
Who else noticed this "worst" moral behavior ?
Examples? Someone else besides twhitehead to anticipate his specimens ?
11 Apr 17
Originally posted by sonshipHey! That hurts! Where's my name? 😉My advice to sonship is based upon my premise that he doesn't participate here as if it were a debate and discussion board.
People on this Forum with whom I have participated in back and forth, back and forth, debates / discussions (and sometime extensive ones) at one time or another ( a few names that immediately come to mind) -
FMF ...[text shortened]... for themselves.
Yes, often though I do not entertain comments I think of as not too pertinent.
11 Apr 17
Originally posted by sonshipFrankly, I don't know what twhitehead is on about. Everyone, almost everyone, posting in this forum has said some kind of mean thing to someone else at one time or another.
If the behavior is so terribly amoral I would think anyone else should be able to concur (beforehand) with the examples twhitehead has ready to submit.
Who else noticed this "worst" moral behavior ?
Examples? Someone else besides twhitehead to anticipate his specimens ?
twhitehead is just trying to beat me up because he doesn't like me. lol
11 Apr 17
Originally posted by sonshipIf I start "preaching" on a debating board, with long long long copy pasted quotes from texts, endless monologues based closely on the writings of some ideologue or other, maybe seven or eight posts in a row, hacking out doctrine and dogma and sanctimonious cant, day after day, and showing little or no interest in beliefs that are different from mine, then perhaps you can try to characterize me as a "propagandist".
Face it FMF, you just are a militant anti-Christian Faith propagandist.