Originally posted by @eladar
Why do you feel that I should be required to answer your questions?

You should want to answer: in order for you to demonstrate what moral substance you think there is to your wishes with regard to the 80,000,000 people of Iran and also to demonstrate that you are putting forward a moral principle that would and should be applicable elsewhere. It seems you have copped out.

Originally posted by @fmf
You should want to answer: in order for you to demonstrate what moral substance you think there is to your wishes with regard to the 80,000,000 people of Iran and also to demonstrate that you are putting forward a moral principle that would and should be applicable elsewhere. It seems you have copped out.

You really are all about telling others what they should want to do.

Originally posted by @eladar
You really are all about telling others what they should want to do.

You asked me why I thought you should answer the question, and so I told you.

Your attempted moral justification for genocide seems to be parked in the shallowest of cul-de-sacs, so now you are talking about me, and you've stopped talking about how you want there to be a genocide.

Originally posted by @fmf
You asked me why I thought you should answer the question, and so I told you.

Your attempted moral justification for genocide seems to be parked in the shallowest of cul-de-sacs, so now you are talking about me, and you've stopped talking about how you want there to be a genocide.

Well you are wrong, I don't want to answer every question you raise.

Really, you think I should want to answer your questions. You really are a piece.

Originally posted by @eladar
Really, you think I should want to answer your questions.

Yes. You should. Especially when you've just advocated a deliberate genocide against a whole people - millions and millions of people - on account of their religion and suggested that it would be morally sound. You should want to answer the moral questions that this raises. Of course you should.

Originally posted by @fmf
Yes. You should. Especially when you've just advocated a deliberate genocide against a whole people - millions and millions of people - on account of their religion and suggested that it would be morally sound. You should want to answer the moral questions that this raises. Of course you should.

You really are a piece. Gocrawl back into your bottle.

Originally posted by @eladar
You really are a piece. Gocrawl back into your bottle.

You're trying to change the topic to me while your wish for genocide is still dangling there incoherently.

Originally posted by @fmf
You're trying to change the topic to me while your wish for genocide is still dangling there incoherently.

If you call refusing to let you frame every discussion changing the subject, sure.

Originally posted by @eladar
If you call refusing to let you frame every discussion changing the subject, sure.

You brought up wiping out the 80,000,000 Muslims in Iran and suggested that it would be morally sound to do so, not me. I call making a series of futile, personal remarks about me - as you run away from what you have said - to be "changing the subject".

Originally posted by @fmf
You brought up wiping out the 80,000,000 Muslims in Iran and suggested that it would be morally sound to do so, not me. I call making a series of futile, personal remarks about me - as you run away from what you have said - to be "changing the subject".

So what?

Originally posted by @eladar
So what?

This is a moral cul-de-sac of your own making.

Originally posted by @fmf
This is a moral cul-de-sac of your own making.

No, it is your making.

Originally posted by @eladar
No, it is your making.

But it's not me who wants to see tens of millions of innocent people slaughtered and who is then running away from the fact that I've said it. Perhaps you don't know what the word "cul-de-sac" means.

Originally posted by @fmf
But it's not me who wants to see tens of millions of innocent people slaughtered and who is then running away from the fact that I've said it. Perhaps you don't know what the word "cul-de-sac" means.

It is you who wants to see Iran continue in its terrorism and development of Nukes.

Either that or it is you who would not like to see anything done that would actually stop it.

So it is you who choose other people to die.

Originally posted by @eladar
It is you who wants to see Iran continue in its terrorism and development of Nukes.
Either that or it is you who would not like to see anything done that would actually stop it.

Oh? I "want to see Iran continue its terrorism"? I "would not like to see anything done that would actually stop it"? Are you referring to something you think I said on this forum or on the Debates Forum years ago?